Skip Navigation



Alcohol and Alcoholism Advance Access published online on December 19, 2005
Alcohol and Alcoholism, doi:10.1093/alcalc/agh253
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
41/2/193    most recent
agh253v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GORMAN, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by CAROZZA, S. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GORMAN, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by CAROZZA, S. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Medical Council on Alcohol. All rights reserved
Received September 12, 2005
Revised November 19, 2005
Accepted November 22, 2005

Article

EVALUATION OF THE TEXAS 0.08 BAC LAW

D. M. GORMAN 1 *, J. C. HUBER JR 1, and S. E. CAROZZA 1

1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Texas A&M Health Science Center School of Rural Public Health, Bryan, TX 77843, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
D. M. GORMAN, E-mail: gorman{at}srph.tamhsc.edu


  Abstract

Aims: The purpose of the present study was to assess the effects on alcohol-involved traffic crashes and fatalities of the 0.08 blood alcohol concentration (BAC) per se law introduced in the state of Texas in 1999. Method: Data pertaining to alcohol-involved traffic crashes and fatalities were extracted from two datasets: the Fatality Accident Reporting System (FARS) compiled by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (for the period January 1995-September 2002), and the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) reports of Alcohol Related Motor Vehicle Traffic Accidents and Casualties (for the period January 1995-December 2000). The data were analysed using time-series methods (ARIMA routines). The effects of the law on all drivers were assessed, along with the effects among gender, racial, and age subgroups and crash location (urban vs rural). Results: Separate time-series analyses were conducted with all alcohol-involved and fatal alcohol-involved crashes from the DPS dataset and fatal alcohol-involved crashes from the FARS dataset as the outcome variables. None of the effects for either the total sample or any of the subgroups analysed was statistically significant (this was true of both the FARS and DPS datasets). Conclusions: While there is a growing body of evidence that indicates that 0.08 BAC laws can be effective in reducing alcohol-involved traffic accidents and fatalities, the present study shows that this was not the case in Texas. Future research should move beyond the simple question of whether or not 0.08 BAC laws ‘work’ and instead explore in more detail the conditions, such as publicity and enforcement, under which the law does or does not contribute to a decline in alcohol-involved accidents and fatalities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.