Skip Navigation



Alcohol and Alcoholism Advance Access published online on December 1, 2005

Alcohol and Alcoholism, doi:10.1093/alcalc/agh243
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
41/2/174    most recent
agh243v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSSON, K. O.
Right arrow Articles by BERGLUND, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSSON, K. O.
Right arrow Articles by BERGLUND, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Medical Council on Alcohol. All rights reserved
Received April 29, 2005
Revised August 28, 2005
Accepted October 25, 2005


Article

COMPARISON BETWEEN A COGNITIVE BEHAVIOURAL ALCOHOL PROGRAMME AND POST-MAILED MINIMAL INTERVENTION IN HIGH-RISK DRINKING UNIVERSITY FRESHMEN: RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

KENT O. JOHNSSON 1 * and MATS BERGLUND 1

1 Department of Clinical Alcohol Research, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, S-20502 Malmö, Sweden

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
KENT O. JOHNSSON, E-mail: kent.johnsson{at}med.lu.se


   Abstract

Aim: Examine the effect of a 10 h intervention programme compared with post-mailed minimal intervention (PMMI) given to high-risk alcohol-drinking university freshmen in a random design. Method: In total 693 freshmen at the Lund Institute of Technology, Lund University, Sweden were included in the study. A cognitive behavioural alcohol program (CBAP) or PMMI was given to high-risk drinking freshmen (n = 177) in a randomized design. A 10-item screening instrument, Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT), was used before and 1 year after the intervention programmes were given. Results: There were no significant differences between the CBAP and the PMMI groups. Both groups declined their AUDIT scores with -1.7 [CI 95% -2.6, -0.7] and -2.7 [CI 95% -3.6, -1.7], respectively which could be explained by effects of regression to the mean. Conclusion: No significant differences between the groups were found.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Scand J Public HealthHome page
C. Andersson, K. O Johnsson, M. Berglund, and A. Ojehagen
Stress and hazardous alcohol use: Associations with early dropout from university
Scand J Public Health, September 1, 2009; 37(7): 713 - 719.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
H. Stahlbrandt, C. Andersson, K. O. Johnsson, S. J. Tollison, M. Berglund, and M. E. Larimer
Cross-Cultural Patterns in College Student Drinking and its Consequences--A Comparison between the USA and Sweden
Alcohol Alcohol., November 1, 2008; 43(6): 698 - 705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
J. A. CUNNINGHAM
REGRESSION TO THE MEAN: WHAT DOES IT MEAN?
Alcohol Alcohol., September 1, 2006; 41(5): 580 - 580.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
K. O JOHNSSON and M. BERGLUND
CUNNINGHAM CONCERNING 'REGRESSION TO THE MEAN: WHAT DOES IT MEAN?'
Alcohol Alcohol., September 1, 2006; 41(5): 581 - 581.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.