Skip Navigation



Alcohol and Alcoholism Advance Access published online on October 21, 2005
Alcohol and Alcoholism, doi:10.1093/alcalc/agh224
This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
41/1/92    most recent
agh224v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MORTIMER, D.
Right arrow Articles by SEGAL, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MORTIMER, D.
Right arrow Articles by SEGAL, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Medical Council on Alcohol. All rights reserved
Received May 16, 2005
Revised September 28, 2005
Accepted September 29, 2005

Article

ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF INTERVENTIONS FOR PROBLEM DRINKING AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE: DO WITHIN-FAMILY EXTERNAL EFFECTS MAKE A DIFFERENCE?

DUNCAN MORTIMER 1* and LEONIE SEGAL 1

1 Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
DUNCAN MORTIMER, E-mail: duncan.mortimer{at}buseco.monash.edu.au


  Abstract

Aims: To propose methods for the inclusion of within-family external effects in clinical and economic evaluations. To demonstrate the extent of bias due to the exclusion of within-family external effects when measuring the relative performance of interventions for problem drinking and alcohol dependence. Methods: The timing and magnitude of treatment effects are modified to accommodate the external health-related quality of life impact of having a problem or dependent drinker in the family home. Results: The inclusion of within-family external effects reduces cost per QALY estimates of interventions for problem drinking and alcohol dependence thereby improving the performance of all evaluated interventions. In addition, the inclusion of within-family external effects improves the relative performance of interventions targeted at those with moderate-to-severe alcohol dependence as compared to interventions targeted at less severe alcohol problems. Conclusions: Failure to take account of external effects in clinical and economic evaluations results in an uneven playing field. Interventions with readily quantifiable health benefits (where social costs and benefits are predominantly comprised of private costs and benefits) are at a distinct advantage when competing for public funding against interventions with quantitatively important external effects.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.