Alcohol and Alcoholism Advance Access originally published online on October 5, 2004
Alcohol and Alcoholism 2004 39(6):486-492; doi:10.1093/alcalc/agh098
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alcohol & Alcoholism Vol. 39, No. 6 © Medical Council on Alcohol 2004; all rights reserved
EFFECTS OF CB1 CANNABINOID RECEPTOR BLOCKADE ON ETHANOL PREFERENCE AFTER CHRONIC ALCOHOL ADMINISTRATION COMBINED WITH REPEATED RE-EXPOSURES AND WITHDRAWALS
1 Laboratoire de Biologie du Comportement, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium and 2 Sanofi-Synthélabo Recherche, Montpellier, France
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at: Biologie du Comportement, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1 Croix du Sud, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. Tel.: +32 10 474384; Fax: +32 10 474094; E-mail: dewitte{at}bani.ucl.ac.be
(Received 27 March 2004; first review notified 11 May 2004; in revised form 1 July 2004; accepted 3 July 2004)
Aims: The cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, SR141716A, differentially affects the ethanol preference of chronically alcoholized rats when administered during cycles of ethanol exposure and withdrawal. In this study, ethanol preference was investigated in chronically alcoholized rats that underwent regular withdrawal periods during which the brain cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, SR141716A, was administered. Methods: The cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A, 3 or 10 mg/kg/day, was administered i.p. to Wistar rats at the conclusion of a 4-week period of chronic alcoholization, as they commenced a cycle of alcohol withdrawal for 10 days followed by a period of 10 days chronic ethanol exposure. In a second set of experiments, an additional cycle of ethanol withdrawal and re-exposure was given. Preference for ethanol versus water started at the end of the first or second chronic ethanol re-exposure for a period of at least 30 days. Results: In rats pretreated with the higher dose of SR141716A, ethanol preference during free choice was significantly increased after two ethanol re-exposures. In contrast, pretreatment with the lower SR141716A dose induced no significant change in ethanol intake during the free choice followed by either one or two ethanol re-exposures. Conclusions: SR141716A, 10 mg/kg/day dose, induced a significant increase in ethanol preference which was dependent on both the number of ethanol withdrawals and chronic ethanol re-exposures, while 3 mg/kg/day had no significant effect on ethanol preference.