Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DAVIES, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by WALLACE, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DAVIES, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by WALLACE, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Alcohol & Alcoholism Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 346-350, 2004
Alcohol & Alcoholism Vol. 39, No. 4 © Medical Council on Alcohol 2004; all rights reserved

EVIDENCE FOR SOCIAL LEARNING IN THE SELF-PRESENTATION OF ALCOHOL PROBLEMS

J. B. DAVIES1,*, F. McCONNOCHIE2, A. ROSS1, D. HEIM1 and B. WALLACE1

1 Centre for Applied Social Psychology, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow and 2 Department of Psychology, University of Abertay, Dundee, UK

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at: Centre for Applied Social Psychology, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK. j.b.davies{at}strath.ac.uk

(Received 12 January 2004; first review notified 11 February 2004; in revised form 4 March 2004; accepted 28 March 2004)

Aims: To examine the extent to which problem alcohol users' self reports of drinking pattern and symptomatology derive primarily from a functional, learned social-cognitive schema (referred to as a ‘script’ in this paper), rather than from acts of recall or memory. Methods: Using a between-groups design with one repeated (within-subjects) measure, problem drinkers and non-problem drinkers were asked to complete a questionnaire about drinking behaviour and symptoms. Each group filled in the questionnaire twice, under both of two conditions. In condition one, they used the questionnaire to describe their own drinking and in condition two they were asked to describe the drinking of the other group (i.e. the problem drinkers filled out the questionnaire to describe non-problem drinking and the non-problem drinkers described problem drinking). Results: Using analyses of variance for the different sub-scales of the questionnaire, no overall differences were found between the two groups on four of the five subscales. However, clear and significant differences were found between the two conditions. That is, both groups were able to produce clearly differentiated scripts for both problem drinking and non-problem drinking. Conclusions: These data, together with related data from other sources, suggest that ‘scripts’ for problem drinking and for non-problem drinking can be elicited from both problem-drinking and non-problem-drinking groups. The data support conclusions from an earlier study, suggesting that subjects may use learned ‘scripts’ rather than recall when responding to certain types of questionnaire instruments.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.