Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LITTLETON, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by MANN, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LITTLETON, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by MANN, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Alcohol & Alcoholism Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 271-275, 2004
Alcohol & Alcoholism Vol. 39, No. 4 © Medical Council on Alcohol 2004; all rights reserved


COMMENTARY

CHALLENGES TO MEDICATIONS DEVELOPMENT IN TREATING ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE

SUMMARY OF A SYMPOSIUM HELD AT THE ESBRA CONGRESS, PRAGUE, 13 SEPTEMBER 2003

JOHN M. LITTLETON8,*, PHILIPPE DE WITTE2, RAYE LITTEN9, GIAN LUIGI GESSA6, RAINER SPANAGEL4, HENRY KRANZLER10, PHILIPPE LEHERT3, BANKOLE JOHNSON12, JOHN SAUNDERS1, MATS BERGLUND7, ADRON HARRIS13, RAYMOND ANTON11 and KARL MANN5

1 Department of Psychiatry, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 2 Laboratoire de Psychobiologie, Biologie du Comportement, Université de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve and 3 Department of Statistics, Faculty of Economics, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium, 4 Department of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim and 5 Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany, 6 Department of Neuroscience, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy, 7 Department of Clinical Alcohol Research, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden, 8 Department of Molecular and Biomedical Pharmacology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, 9 Treatment Research Branch, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, Maryland, 10 Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, 11 Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, 12 Departments of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas and 13 Waggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research, Section on Neurobiology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Molecular and Biomedical Pharmacology, University of Kentucky, Cooper and University Drives, Lexington, Kentucky 40546-0236, USA. Tel.: +606 257 1085; Fax: +606 323 1077; E-mail: jlittlet{at}uky.edu

(Received 27 February 2004; first review notified 3 March 2004; in revised form 23 March 2004; accepted 28 March 2004)

Few medications for treating alcohol dependence exist. Greater partnership is needed between academia and the pharmaceutical industry to develop, licence and market efficacious medications for treating alcohol dependence. Methodologies that span the divide between preclinical and large-scale clinical studies need to be developed in order to provide sufficient information on safety, toleration, drug-interaction profile and efficacy, with which to guide development decisions. Due to the heterogeneous nature of alcohol dependence, the effort of developing an efficacious medication is likely to be enhanced by clearer choices about the characteristics of the population. Careful consideration of potential mechanism of action of the putative therapeutic medication should enable the appropriate choice of drinking endpoint. The pharmaceutical industry in collaboration with academia might need to develop new approaches to determining appropriate treatment endpoints with regulatory bodies. The investment risk to industry should be appraised not only in terms of the rather poor results of previous marketing efforts but with a view to the opportunity to penetrate a potentially enormous and largely untapped market.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.