Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (22)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Townshend, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Duka, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Townshend, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Duka, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Alcohol and Alcoholism Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 187-192, 2002
© 2002 Medical Council on Alcohol

PATTERNS OF ALCOHOL DRINKING IN A POPULATION OF YOUNG SOCIAL DRINKERS: A COMPARISON OF QUESTIONNAIRE AND DIARY MEASURES

J. M. Townshend and T. Duka,*

Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK

Received 31 May 2001; first review notified 31 July 2001; accepted 27 August 2001

Studies of alcohol use often depend on self-reported alcohol intake measured by quantity/frequency questionnaires. Previous research has shown that alcohol consumption may be underestimated by this type of retrospective questionnaire. The primary aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of an Alcohol Use Questionnaire (AUQ) with a 4-week diary account. A further aim was to explore patterns of drinking in young social drinkers, with particular attention to binge drinking, which has been suggested as a factor in increasing the risk of alcohol dependency. University students completed the AUQ in the laboratory. They were then asked to keep a record of their alcohol, nicotine and caffeine consumption over a 4-week period (diary). The questionnaire and the diaries were compared on factors of alcohol intake (units per week) and patterns of drinking behaviour (speed of drinking, number of times being drunk and percentage of times getting drunk when drinking). The two measures (AUQ and diary) were highly correlated on alcohol consumption and the other questions relating to drinking behaviour. However, differences were found between the two measures on alcohol intake, speed of drinking (drinks per hour) and number of times being drunk. Alcohol consumption was underestimated by ~12% on the questionnaire, and, when the accuracy of estimation of drinking habits was examined, it was found that high drinkers tended to underestimate their drinking behaviour, whereas lower drinkers tended to overestimate. The results suggest that the AUQ can be used with a reasonable degree of confidence, bearing in mind the tendency for high drinkers to underestimate consumption and drinking behaviour. Relationships between ‘binge scores’, beverage specificity and alcohol consumption support the idea that the criteria for binge drinkers should be based on patterns of drinking rather than alcohol consumption.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. L. Crawford, N. E. Avis, E. Gold, J. Johnston, J. Kelsey, N. Santoro, M. Sowers, and B. Sternfeld
Sensitivity and Specificity of Recalled Vasomotor Symptoms in a Multiethnic Cohort
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2008; 168(12): 1452 - 1459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
D. N Stephens and T. Duka
Cognitive and emotional consequences of binge drinking: role of amygdala and prefrontal cortex
Phil Trans R Soc B, October 12, 2008; 363(1507): 3169 - 3179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J PsychopharmacolHome page
A. Jackson, D. Stephens, and T. Duka
Gender differences in response to lorazepam in a human drug discrimination study
J Psychopharmacol, November 1, 2005; 19(6): 614 - 619.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.