Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harasymiw, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bean, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harasymiw, J.
Right arrow Articles by Bean, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Alcohol and Alcoholism Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 349-353, 2001
© 2001 Medical Council on Alcoholism

The combined use of the early detection of alcohol consumption (EDAC) test and carbohydrate-deficient transferrin to identify heavy drinking behaviour in males

Jim Harasymiw,* and Pamela Bean,1

Alcohol Detection Services, LLC, 4670 Somerset Court, Brookfield, WI 53045 and
1 Millennium Strategies, 418 N. Westfield Road, Madison, WI 53717, USA

Received 18 September 2000; first review notified 12 February 2001; accepted 23 February 2001

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of the combined use of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) and the Early Detection of Alcohol Consumption (EDAC) test to assess heavy drinking in a population of males (n = 187) drinking an average of 20 drinks per day. Heavy drinkers (n = 138) and light drinkers (n = 49) were analysed in three ways: using the EDAC test alone, using the CDT test alone and using the EDAC and CDT tests combined. The EDAC method uses linear discriminant function to analyse a battery of routine laboratory tests that generate a score for each subject and its associated probability value. This translates into the likelihood of each individual being a heavy or a light drinker. CDT uses ion-exchange chromatography to extract CDT in the serum and quantifies it by radioimmunoassay. The EDAC alone showed 88% (122/138) sensitivity rate when identifying heavy drinking males and 98% (48/49) specificity rate when assessing light drinkers. The CDT test alone showed a sensitivity rate of 58% (80/138) and a corresponding specificity rate of 96% (47/49). When analysed in parallel, 92% (127/138) of heavy drinkers showed abnormal EDAC and/or CDT tests and 94% (46/49) of light drinkers were negative for both tests. When analysed sequentially, the CDT test confirmed 61% (75/122) of the heavy drinkers identified by the EDAC test. Specificity rate for this testing strategy was 100%, because the only false positives for EDAC tested negative for CDT. This preliminary study shows that EDAC and CDT may react independently to alcohol intake and can be combined for maximum diagnostic accuracy.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Am Board Fam MedHome page
M. Fleming and M. Mundt
Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin: Validity of a New Alcohol Biomarker in a Sample of Patients with Diabetes and Hypertension
J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2004; 17(4): 247 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.