Skip Navigation


Alcohol and Alcoholism Advance Access originally published online on December 19, 2006
Alcohol and Alcoholism 2007 42(2):64-69; doi:10.1093/alcalc/agl116
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/2/64    most recent
agl116v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RETANA-UGALDE, R.
Right arrow Articles by MENDOZA-NÚÑEZ, V. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RETANA-UGALDE, R.
Right arrow Articles by MENDOZA-NÚÑEZ, V. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Medical Council on Alcohol. All rights reserved

IS THERE A SIMILARITY BETWEEN DNA DAMAGE IN ADULTS WITH CHRONIC ALCOHOLISM AND COMMUNITY-DWELLING HEALTHY OLDER ADULTS?

RAQUEL RETANA-UGALDE1, MARIO ALTAMIRANO-LOZANO2 and VÍCTOR MANUEL MENDOZA-NÚÑEZ1,*

1 Unidad de Investigación en Gerontología, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico
2 Unidad de Investigación en Citogenética y Mutagénesis, Facultad de Estudios Superiores Zaragoza, UNAM Mexico City, Mexico

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at: Batalla 5 de mayo s/n, Esq. Fuerte de Loreto, Col. Ejército de Oriente, 09230 México, DF., México. Tel: +52 55 5623 0721; Fax: +52 55 5773 6330; E-mail: mendovic{at}servidor.unam.mx

Received 3 April 2006; first review notified 10 July 2006; in revised form 23 November 2006; accepted 23 November 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Aims: Daily alcohol consumption and ageing have been linked with DNA damage, leading to the hypothesis that chronic alcoholism causes DNA damage similar to that which occurs with ageing. Likewise, it has been suggested that chronic alcoholism is the cause of accelerated or premature ageing. The objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency and magnitude of DNA damage among adults with chronic alcoholism and healthy older adults residing in Mexico City. Methods: A cross-sectional and comparative study was carried out in a sample of 53 chronic alcoholics of 25–44 years of age (without alcohol ingestion in the past 30 days) without additional diseases, 26 healthy subjects ≥60 years of age, and 25 healthy adults of 25–44 years of age without alcohol addiction, all residents of Mexico City during the past 10 years. DNA damage was evaluated by single-cell gel electrophoresis technique (Comet assay). Results: Our results showed a similar percentage of DNA damage between healthy elderly subjects and chronic alcoholics (62 vs 55%, P >0.05), although average DNA migration was greater in alcoholics than in the elderly (78.1 ± 33.2 vs 58.6 ± 26.2, P = 0.09). However, the percentage of subjects with more than six damaged cells was higher in the older adults subjects group than in the group chronic alcoholics (19 vs 35%, P = 0.16). Conclusions: Data suggest that DNA damage is not similar in young subjects with chronic alcoholism that which occurs with ageing.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chronic and excessive consumption of alcoholic beverages provokes membrane lipoperoxidation due to triglyceride accumulation in hepatocytes, increasing fat in the cell that serves as substrate for its oxidation and thus forms free radicals (FR) (Ueshima et al., 1993Go; Sherman and Williams, 1994Go; Achord, 1995Go; Lieber, 1997Go, Lamarche et al., 2003Go). Likewise, this favours protein degradation and DNA oxidation in which acetaldehyde, the product of ethanol metabolism, is able to form links with free sulfhydryl and amino groups (denominated Schiff bases), provoking toxic effects, inducing crossovers and oxidation in DNA, as well as formation of adducts with proteins (Behrens et al., 1988Go; Tamame-González and Toranzo-Martínez, 1988Go; Nelson et al., 1992Go; Brooks, 1997Go). In such regard, acetaldehyde joins with hepatic glutathione, establishing hemiacetyl links with the L-cysteine amino acid that forms part of the glutathione molecule. In this sense, the cytotoxicity of the acetaldehyde is very similar to the free-radical theory proposed to explain cell ageing (Sillanaukee et al., 1992Go; Wehr et al., 1993Go). Also it was pointed that ageing is the product of the accumulation of oxidative damage in organs and systems due to the biochemical processes of normal aerobic metabolism (Harman, 1981Go; Kristal and Yu, 1992Go; Rusting, 1992Go).

On the other hand, it has been pointed out that oxidative stress (OxS) associated with excessive FR production is the cause of cell damage similar to that which takes place with ageing (Harman, 1992Go); similarly, it has been demonstrated that chronic and excessive consumption of alcoholic beverages provokes OxS and consequently liver damage, cardiovascular diseases, and cancer (Ryan, 1982Go; Holden et al., 1988Go; Varga, 1991Go; Trujillo and Espinosa, 1992Go; Poli, 1993Go; Brooks and Theruvathu, 2005Go). Likewise, it has been proposed that chronic alcoholism is the cause of accelerated or premature ageing, evidence of which can be observed through DNA measurement (Noonberg et al., 1985Go; Carrano and Natarajan, 1988Go; Singh et al., 1988Go, 1991aGo,bGo; Gedik et al., 1992Go; McKelvey-Martin et al., 1993Go; Anderson et al., 1994Go; Ross et al., 1995Go). For this reason, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the similarity between DNA damage in chronic alcoholic subjects and in healthy elderly individuals.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Design and subjects
A cross-sectional and comparative study was carried out in a sample of 53 adults with chronic alcoholism, with a mean age of 36 ± 5.4 years, and a mean consumption of ethanol 383.23 ± 21.0 g/d during the past 10 years (without alcohol ingestion in the past 30 days) and without additional diseases, 26 community-dwelling healthy older adults ≥60 years of age, with a mean age of 70 ± 7.8 years and 25 healthy adults of 25–44 years of age, with a mean age of 32 ± 4.5 years, without alcohol addiction. All subjects had lived in Mexico City for the past 10 years at the time of the study and showed normal haemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, glucose, urea, creatinine, urate, albumin, cholesterol, triglycerides, and cholesterol high-density lipoproteins (HDL).

The subjects agreed to participate in the study after giving their informed consent. The Ethics Committee of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Zaragoza Campus, approved the research protocol for the study, in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration.

Nutritional measurement
Subjects of the three groups were Well-nourished: (i) body mass index (BMI; weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in metres) of 22.1–27 kg/m2, (ii) caloric intake ≥2000 cal (8368 J) per day, and serum albumin ≥35 g/l, (iii) proteins and vitamins were between cut-off points of RDA (Institute of Medicine, 2003Go). The intake of calories, proteins and vitamins was measured by dietary recalls with standardized software (Hernandez-Avila et al., 1998).

Blood and biochemical analyses
Blood samples were collected after a 12-h fasting period by venopuncture procedure and placed in vacutainer, siliconized test tubes containing no additives and a separating gel. Heparin was the anticoagulant agent used. Blood samples containing heparin were analysed using complete haemoglobin test protocol (including haemoglobin, hematocrit, and leukocyte counts). The serum obtained from samples containing no anticoagulant agent was subjected to the following tests: glucose, urea, creatinine, urate, albumin, cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, total bilirubin, and conjugated bilirubin concentrations; alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT), and pseudocholinesterase (CHS) activities. All reagents employed in biochemical tests were obtained from Randox Laboratories, Ltd (Crumlin, Co., Antrim, UK). Cut-off points for reference values were determined at the Gerontologic Clinical Research Laboratory of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Zaragoza Campus, in Mexico City (Sánchez-Rodríguez et al., 1998Go).

These tests were used as screening measurements for diagnosis of clinically healthy subjects.

Alkaline unicellular electrophoresis
The alkaline unicellular electrophoresis assay using blood samples was performed as described by Singh et al., 1988Go. The positive control was made with 200 µl of whole blood in 1 ml of Hanks Balanced Salt Solution (Ca++, Mg++-free) containing 200 µM H2O2 for 30 min, immersed in an ice-cold water; at the end of the treatment period, removed supernatant and the pellet the cells used for the assay.

The analysis of DNA damage was done in blinded fashion and the migration was calculated as the difference between length and diameter. The criterion for determining DNA damage was to follow the amounts of DNA in the tail: without DNA damage (DNA migration ≤5%); with DNA damage (DNA migration >5%). Another criterion for evaluation was degree DNA damage was low degree DNA damage when cells had 5–40% and high degree DNA damage when cells had >40% (Fig. 1) (Anderson et al., 1994Go; Mendoza-Núñez et al., 2001Go); also we evaluated the magnitude of DNA damage by number of cells by individual. In this sense, it was used two categories: low magnitude when subjects had 1–5 cells with DNA damage and high magnitude when subjects had 6 more cells with DNA damage.


Figure 1
View larger version (102K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 1. Images of comets (from lymphocytes), stained whit ethidium bromide. Without damage; B. Low-degree DNA damage when cells had 5–40%; high-degree DNA damage when cells had >40% and >95%.

 
Statistical analysis
Data were processed by use of standard statistical software SPSS 10.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics are means ± standard deviation (SD) and percentages; median values with 25th and 75th percentiles. Mann–Whitney test, Kruskal–Wallis test, chi-square test or Fisher's exact were used for statistical analyses as appropriate, with a significance level of P < 0.05, and odds ratio (OR) of logistic regression analysis with 95% confidence interval (CI) were performed.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Biochemical characteristics and hepatic enzymes
We found that serum GGT and AST were increased in healthy older adults and adults with chronic alcoholism, compared with healthy adults (P < 0.05); however, bilirubins and ALT serum levels in healthy adults and healthy older adults were similar (P > 0.05), although in alcoholics was increased (P < 0.05). Nevertheless, the values of hepatic enzymes and biochemical characteristics of the three study groups remained within reference values (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Median values and 25th and 75th percentiles of total bilirubin and hepatic enzymes in healthy adults, adults with chronic alcoholism and healthy older adults

 
DNA damage
We found a DNA damage frequency of 16% in healthy adults, in contrast with 55% in adults with chronic alcoholism and 62% in healthy older adults; these differences were statistically significant on comparison between healthy adults vs alcoholic adults (P < 0.05) and healthy adults vs elderly adults (P < 0.05). Likewise, we observed that DNA damage frequency in groups of healthy older adults and adult alcoholics was statistically similar (P = 0.82) (Fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 2. Frequency of DNA damage in healthy adults, adults with chronic alcoholism and healthy older adults. Chi-square test. Percentage of DNA damage: adults with chronic alcoholism vs healthy adults P < 0.001; older adults vs healthy adults P < 0.01; adults with chronic alcoholism vs older adults P > 0.05.

 
DNA migration
On comparing migration totals of the comet tail without taking into consideration nucleus and total migration, the group of alcoholic adults demonstrated an average DNA migration value that was higher than in group of healthy elderly adults and the average was significantly higher than in group of healthy adults (P < 0.05) (Table 2 and Fig. 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PowerPoint slide]
 
Fig. 3. (a) The graphic shows DNA migration of cells of healthy adults. (b) The graphic shows DNA migration of cells of adults with chronic alcoholism. (c) The graphic shows DNA migration of cells of healthy older adults. The highest DNA migration was observed in adults with chronic alcoholism followed of the healthy older adults and healthy adults.

 


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Mean values ± SD of DNA migration in healthy adults, adults with chronic alcoholism and healthy older adults

 
Cell damage magnitude
The healthy adults not showed a magnitude of six or more cells with DNA damage in contrast with adult alcoholics and healthy older adults, in whom we found 19 and 35%, respectively, with six or more cells with DNA damage (Table 3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. DNA damage by number of cells in healthy adults, adults with chronic alcoholism and healthy older adults

 
Degree of DNA damage
With regard to degree of DNA damage, we observed in the healthy adult group a significantly lower percentage of DNA damage by ≥40% in comparison with adult alcoholics and healthy older adults (P < 0.05); nonetheless, the percentage of DNA damage ≥40% between adult alcoholics and healthy older adults was similar (P > 0.05) (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Degree of DNA damage in cells of healthy adults, adults with chronic alcoholism and healthy older adults

 
DNA damage-associated risk factors
The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the alcohol ingestion and age (≥60 years) were a risk factors for DNA damage (OR = 2.28, 95% CI= 1.1–4.73; P < 0.05; OR = 1.06, 95% CI= 1.02–1.11; P < 0.05, respectively). In relation of smoking the logistic regression analysis not showed significantly influence (Table 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Alcohol ingestion, age, tobacco and coffee as risk factors for DNA damage*

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Alcohol acts in a very varied manner within the organism and chronic alcohol consumption is associated with an increase in the incidence of a variety of diseases ranging from hepatitis to cancer (Brooks, 1997Go). It has been observed that high ethanol consumption results in an increase of OxS with the formation of FR and lipid peroxidation, the process of which produces cellular ageing. In this respect, it has been demonstrated that at the neurological level alcoholism provokes accelerated ageing due to biochemical changes provoked by ethanol in the nervous system; these changes are very similar to those occurring in normal ageing (Noonberg et al., 1985Go; Holden et al., 1988Go; Trujillo and Espinosa, 1992Go).

OxS has been linked to numerous chronic degenerative diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, atherosclerosis, cataracts, and Alzheimer disease, because OxS provokes cell damage in different organs such as kidney, heart, brain, and liver in the same way in which the ageing of systems occurs and in which chronic ingestion of alcohol can favour these processes (Varga, 1991Go; Nohl, 1993Go; Poli, 1993Go).

On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that evaluation of DNA damage is a good biological marker for OxS; thus, this is considered a fragility indicator for older adults and one that can be useful for detecting cellular damage produced by ethanol (Duthie et al., 1996Go; Retana-Ugalde et al., 1997Go). In this regard, some in vitro studies show that chronic ethanol consumption increases DNA damage in lymphocytes, and that it is acetaldehyde, the product of ethanol metabolism, that causes this; similarly, the mechanism proposed is that of FR generation (Singh and Khan, 1995Go).

In terms of OxS, results reported in the scientific literature are inconsistent, above all in elderly population, because there are authors who note that ageing in itself is accompanied by OxS, and that therefore, there is greater damage to biomolecules in comparison with young adults (Martin and Rademaker, 1987Go; Pacifici and Davies, 1991Go; Markesbery, 1997Go). In this regard, in our study we observed greater DNA damage in older adults than in adults; this findings is in contrast with that reported by Betti et al. (1994)Go, who carried out a study on 100 normal subjects of different ages without finding a difference in DNA damage between young people and the elderly. Likewise, our investigation group demonstrated that the urban environment is a determining factor of OxS in the elderly, because in the rural environment OxS is similar in the elderly and the young (Sánchez-Rodríguez et al., 2005Go); therefore, environment and lifestyle are factors that should be taken into consideration in addition to ageing.

With respect to reported studies on alcoholic subjects, elevation of chromosomal changes, induction of sister chromatids, and breaking of DNA chains have been found. Similarly, studies have been conducted on ethanol and acetaldehyde-associated chromosomal-damage induction mechanisms; nonetheless, the results are unclear, because there are authors who mention that ethanol is an antioxidant, as well as the fact that ethanol is mutagenic, carcinogenic, and teratogenic in humans (Hayes, 1985Go; Singh and Khan, 1995Go; Phillips and Jenkinson, 2001Go; Tavares et al., 2001Go).

In such regard, the results obtained in the present study showed that the DNA damage frequency observed in adults with chronic alcoholism and in older adults is similar (elderly adults, 62% vs young alcoholics, 55%; P > 0.05). In this sense, Varga (1991)Go, points out that chronic exposure to alcohol favours premature ageing, because the cellular mass condensation observed during ageing coincides with lipid and protein accumulation observed in alcohol-related liver damage.

However, observing mean total of DNA damage migration in these groups, we note that for healthy adults 21.8 µm ± 7.1 was found, while for older adults, we found 33.6 µm ± 26.2, values that as previously indicated were lower than those for adults with chronic alcoholism, who demonstrated a value of 52.9 µm ± 33.4, but not with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.09). This allows us to suppose that despite the fact that some authors report that DNA damage increases with age (Singh et al., 1991aGo; Barnett and King, 1995Go) and with exposure to alcohol and acetaldehyde (Singh and Khan, 1995Go; Singh et al., 1995Go) the degree of damage is not the same, because in older adults this damage presents gradually as the subjects advance in age without significantly affecting the homeostasis of each individual; nevertheless, in alcoholics chronic exposure to ethanol provokes significant and lasting homeostatic alteration, propitiating a higher degree of DNA damage than that occurring with ageing.

Lastly, in risk analysis it is corroborated that although there are similarities in frequency, magnitude, and degree of DNA damage between alcoholics and healthy elderly adults the weight of alcohol ingestion as a risk factor for DNA damage is greater than age. Therefore our results suggest that there are not similarity between DNA damage in adults with chronic alcoholism and community-dwelling healthy older adults.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Achord J. L. (1995) Alcohol and the liver. Science and Medicine, Scientific American 2:16–25.

Anderson D., Yu T. W., Phillips B. J., et al. (1994) The effect of various antioxidants and other modifying agents on oxygen-radical-generated DNA damage in human lymphocytes in the comet assay. Mutation Research 307:261–271.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Barnett Y. A. and King C. M. (1995) An investigation of antioxidant status, DNA repair capacity and mutation as a function of age in humans. Mutation Research 338:115–128.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Behrens U. J., Hoerner M., Lasker J. M., et al. (1988) Formation of acetaldehyde adducts with etanol-inducible p450IIE1 in vivo. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 154:584–590.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Betti C., Davini T., Giannessi L., et al. (1994) Microgel electrophoresis assay (Comet test) and SCE analysis in human lymphocytes from 100 normal subjets. Mutation Research 307:323–333.[Web of Science][Medline]

Brooks P. J. (1997) DNA damage, DNA repair, and alcohol toxicity a review. Alcoholism, Clinical & Experimental Research 21:1073–1082.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Brooks P. J. and Theruvathu J. A. (2005) DNA adducts from acetaldehyde: implications for alcohol-related carcinogenesis. Alcohol 35:187–193.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Carrano A. V. and Natarajan A. T. (1988) Considerations for population monitoring using cytogenetic techniques. Mutation Research 204:379–406.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Duthie S. J., Ma A., Ross M. A., et al. (1996) Antioxidant suplementation decreases oxidative DNA damage in human lymphocytes. Cancer Research 56:1291–1295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Gedik C. M., Ewen S. W., Collins A. R. (1992) Single-cell gel electrophoresis applied to the analysis of UV-C damage and its repair in human cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology 62:313–320.[Web of Science][Medline]

Harman D. (1981) The aging process. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 78:7124–7128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harman D. (1992) Free radical theory of aging. Mutation Research 275:257–266.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hayes S. (1985) Ethanol-induced genotoxicity. Mutation Research 143:23–27.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Hernández-Ávila M., Romieu I., Parra S., et al. (1998) Validity and reproducibility a food frequency questionnaire to assess dietary intake of women living in Mexico City. Salud Pública de México 39:133–140.[Web of Science]

Holden K. L., McLaughlin E. J., Reilly E. L., et al. (1988) Accelerated mental aging in alcoholic patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology 44:286–292.[Web of Science][Medline]

Institute of Medicine. (2003) Dietary reference intakes: applications in dietary planning(The National Academies Press, Washington DC).

Kristal B. S. and Yu B. P. (1992) An emerging hypothesis: synergistic induction of aging by free radicals and Maillard reactions. Journal of Gerontology 47:B107–B114.

Lamarche F., Gonthier B., Signorini N., et al. (2003) Acute exposure of cultured neurones to ethanol results in reversible DNA single-strand breaks; whereas chronic exposure causes loss of cell viability. Alcohol and Alcoholism 38:550–558.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lieber C. S. (1997) Ethanol metabolism, cirrhosis and alcoholism. Clinica Chimica Acta 257:59–84.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Markesbery W. R. (1997) Oxidative stress hypothesis in Alzheimer's disease. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 23:134–147.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Martin R. H. and Rademaker A. W. (1987) The effect of age on the frequency of sperm chromosomal abnormalities in normal men. American Journal of Human Genetics 41:484–492.[Web of Science][Medline]

McKelvey-Martin V. J., Green M. H., Schmezer P., et al. (1993) The single cell electrophoresis assay (comet assay): An European review. Mutation Research 288:47–63.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Mendoza-Núñez V. M., Sánchez-Rodríguez M. A., Retana-Ugalde R., et al. (2001) Age and gender as risk factors for DNA damage in lymphocytes of elderly. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development 122:835–847.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nelson D. E., Sattin R. W., Langlois J. A., et al. (1992) Alcohol as a risk factor for fall injury events among elderly persons living in the community. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 40:658–661.[Web of Science][Medline]

Noonberg A., Goldstein G., Page H. A. (1985) Premature aging in male alcoholics: "accelerated aging" or "increased vulnerability"? Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research 9:334–338.[Web of Science][Medline]

Nohl H. (1993) Involvement of free radicals in ageing: a consequence or cause of senescence. British Medical Bulletin 49:653–667.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pacifici R. E. and Davies K. J. (1991) Protein, lipid and DNA repair system in oxidative stress: the free-radical theory of aging revisited. Gerontology 37:166–180.[Web of Science][Medline]

Phillips B. J. and Jenkinson P. (2001) Is ethanol genotoxic? A review of the published data. Mutagenesis 16:91–101.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Poli G. (1993) Liver damage due to free radicals. British Medical Bulletin 49:604–620.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Retana-Ugalde R., Altamirano-Lozano M., Mendoza-Núñez V. M., et al. (1997) Daño en el ADN como posible predictor de fragilidad en el proceso de envejecimiento. Tópicos de Investigación y Posgrado 5:180–184.

Ross G. M., Mcmillan T. J., Wilcox P., et al. (1995) The single cell microgel electrophoresis assay (comet assay): Technical aspects and applications. Report on the 5th LH Gray Trust Workshop, Institute of Cancer Research, 1994. Mutation Research 337:57–60.[Web of Science][Medline]

Rusting L. R. (1992) Why do we age? Scientific American 367:86–95.

Ryan C. (1982) Alcoholism and premature aging: A neuropsychological perspective, alcoholism. Clinical Experimental Research 6:22–30.

Sánchez-Rodríguez M., Mendoza-Núñez V. M., García-Sánchez A., et al. (1998) Valores de referencia para una población de ancianos y adultos de la Ciudad de México. Parámetros bioquímicos y hematológicos. Acta Bioquímica Clínica Latinoamericana 32:812–821.

Sánchez-Rodríguez M. A., Retana-Ugalde R., Ruiz-Ramos M., et al. (2005) Efficient antioxidant capacity against lipid peroxide levels in healthy elderly of Mexico City. Environmental Research 97:322–329.[Medline]

Sherman D. I. and Williams R. (1994) Liver damage: mechanisms and management. British Medical Bulletin 50:124–138.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sillanaukee P., Seppa K., Koivula T., et al. (1992) Acetaldehyde-modified hemoglobin as marker of alcohol consumption: Comparison of two new methods. The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 120:42–47.[Web of Science][Medline]

Singh N. P. and Khan A. (1995) Acetaldehyde: genotoxity and cytotoxicity in human lymphocytes. Mutation Research 337:9–17.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Singh N. P., McCoy M. T., Tice R. R., et al. (1988) A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Experimental Cell Research 175:184–191.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Singh N. P., Danner D. B., Tice R. R., et al. (1991a) Basal DNA damage in individual human lymphocytes with age. Mutation Research 256:1–6.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Singh N. P., Tice R. R., Stephens R. E., et al. (1991b) A microgel electrophoresis technique for the direct quantitation of DNA damage and repair in individual fibroblast cultured on microscope slides. Mutation Research 252:289–296.[Web of Science][Medline]

Singh N. P., Lai H., Khan A. (1995) Ethanol-induced single-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells. Mutation Research 345:191–196.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Tamame-González G. and Toranzo-Martínez I. (1988) Alcohol y aparato digestivo en el anciano. Geriatrika 4:34–39.

Tavares D. C., Cecchi A. O., Jordão A. A. Jr, et al. (2001) Cytogenetic study of chronic ethanol consumption in rats. Teratogenesis. Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis 21:361–368.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Trujillo S. J. and Espinosa V. G. (1992) La ingestión crónica de alcohol provoca atrofia cito y ultraestructural en corteza cerebral de ratas. Envejecimiento Acelerado? Revista Mexicana de Geriatría y Gerontología 2:167–169.

Ueshima Y., Matsuda Y., Wang B. Y., et al. (1993) Ethanol and acetaldehyde metabolism in culture rat hepatocytes. Alcohol and Alcoholism Supplement 1A:3–10.

Varga M. (1991) How can free radicals cause damage to hepatic cells. A multidisciplinary approach. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 27:117–119.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wehr H., Rodo M., Lieber C. S., et al. (1993) Acetaldehyde adducts and autoantibodies against VLDL and LDL in alcoholics. Journal of Lipid Research 34:1237–1244.[Abstract]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/2/64    most recent
agl116v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RETANA-UGALDE, R.
Right arrow Articles by MENDOZA-NÚÑEZ, V. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RETANA-UGALDE, R.
Right arrow Articles by MENDOZA-NÚÑEZ, V. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?