Skip Navigation


Alcohol and Alcoholism Advance Access originally published online on June 23, 2006
Alcohol and Alcoholism 2006 41(5):486-493; doi:10.1093/alcalc/agl049
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
41/5/486    most recent
agl049v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JERLHAG, E.
Right arrow Articles by ENGEL, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JERLHAG, E.
Right arrow Articles by ENGEL, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Medical Council on Alcohol. All rights reserved

ROLE OF THE SUBUNIT COMPOSITION OF CENTRAL NICOTINIC ACETYLCHOLINE RECEPTORS FOR THE STIMULATORY AND DOPAMINE-ENHANCING EFFECTS OF ETHANOL

ELISABET JERLHAG1, MORTEN GRØTLI2, KRISTINA LUTHMAN2, LENNART SVENSSON2 and JÖRGEN A. ENGEL1,*

1 Institute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, Göteborg University, Box 431, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden and 2 Department of Chemistry, Medicinal Chemistry, Göteborg University, SE 412 96 Göteborg, Sweden

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at: Tel.: +46 31 773 34 16; Fax: +46 31 773 32 84; E-mail: jorgen.engel{at}pharm.gu.se

(Received 22 December 2005; first review notified 20 January 2006; in revised form 12 May 2006; accepted 16 May 2006)


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Aims: The stimulatory, rewarding, and dopamine (DA)-enhancing effects of ethanol may involve central nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR), especially those located in the ventral tegmental area (VTA). Identifying the subunit composition that mediates these effects of ethanol would increase the understanding of the neurochemical basis underlying the addictive properties of ethanol. In the present series of experiments, the role of the Formula and/or Formula and/or Formula subunits of the nAChR for the stimulatory and DA-enhancing effects of ethanol was investigated by using {alpha}-conotoxin MII ({alpha}CtxMII), selective to the Formula and/or Formula and/or the Formula subunits of the nAChR, and the {alpha}-conotoxin PIA-analogue ({alpha}CtxPIA-analogue), suggested to be selective to the Formula subunits. Methods: {alpha}CtxMII and the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue were synthesized using a modified literature procedure. The purity and identity of the peptides were confirmed with HPLC and FAB-MS analyses, respectively. Locomotor activity and in vivo microdialysis in freely moving mice were used. Results: {alpha}CtxMII and the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue were synthesized in good yields (>95%; >90%). In addition, we found that synthesized {alpha}CtxMII antagonized ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation, which confirms our previous results with the commercially available {alpha}CtxMII. Furthermore, the synthesized {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue, assumably also selective for Formula subunits of the nAChR, did neither antagonize the stimulatory nor the accumbal DA-enhancing effects of ethanol. Conclusion: These results indicate that {alpha}CtxMII- but not {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue-sensitive receptors, i.e. the Formula and/or Formula rather than the Formula subunits of the nAChR, appear to be of greater importance for these effects of ethanol and that these subunits could constitute neurochemical targets for developing new drugs for the treatment of alcohol dependence.


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Several clinical and epidemiological studies have demonstrated an association between the consumption of alcohol and the use of tobacco, i.e. nicotine, among the general population as well as among alcoholics (Istvan and Matarazzo, 1984Go; Bien and Burge, 1990Go; Miller and Gold, 1998Go). For instance ~80–90% of all alcoholics are smokers (Walton, 1972Go; Ayers et al., 1976Go; Bien and Burge, 1990Go; Batel et al., 1995Go; Miller and Gold, 1998Go), smokers consume twice as much alcohol than non-smokers (Carmody et al., 1985Go), and alcoholism is estimated to be 10–14 times more common among smokers than non-smokers (DiFranza and Guerrera, 1990Go). There also appears to be a strong correlation between the onset of tobacco abuse at an early age and addiction to alcohol later in life (DiFranza and Guerrera, 1990Go; Grant, 1998Go). Moreover, ethanol has been found to potentiate the rewarding effects of nicotine among smokers (Rose et al., 2004Go). Taken together, these clinical findings suggest that ethanol and nicotine can share important neurochemical mechanisms of action in the brain reward systems, e.g. involving nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR). The first evidence for a possible interference between ethanol and nAChR was discovered in our laboratory showing that chronic ethanol consumption produced changes in the Bmax for [3H]nicotine in different regions of the rat brain (Yoshida et al., 1982Go). In subsequent studies on the functional significance of these findings we have found that ethanol intake and preference as well as ethanol-induced stimulation of the mesolimbic DA system and of locomotor activity may involve activation of central nAChR, especially those in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) (Larsson and Engel, 2004Go; Larsson et al., 2005Go). Further support for the assumption that the nAChR could serve as one common denominator for the ethanol-nicotine interaction has been provided from mainly electrophysiological studies showing that ethanol can stabilize the open state of the Torpedo nAChR (Wu et al., 1994Go; Forman and Zhou, 1999Go), increase the agonist affinity for this receptor (Forman et al., 1989Go), and enhance the response to nicotine indicating that ethanol may also act as a co-agonist to ACh on nAChRs (Marszalec et al., 1999Go).

The pentameric nAChRs are widely distributed in the brain and the mesocorticolimbic DA pathway expresses high levels of nAChRs, both pre-synaptic and somatodendritic (Clarke and Pert, 1985Go). In the central nervous system {alpha}2{alpha}7, {alpha}9, {alpha}10, and ß2–ß4 subunits of the nAChR have been identified and these can be expressed in various combinations of either heteromeric or homomeric receptors (Nicke et al., 2004Go). The {alpha}3{alpha}7 and ß2–ß4 (Klink et al., 2001Go) as well as the {alpha}3{alpha}6 and ß2–ß3 (Charpantier et al., 1998Go; Le Novere et al., 2002Go) subunits of the nAChR have been identified in the VTA. The central nAChRs, especially those located in the VTA, might play a central role in the neurochemical events mediating the stimulatory, DA-enhancing, and rewarding properties not only of nicotine (Clarke et al., 1988Go; Wonnacott et al., 1990Go; Di Chiara, 2000Go) but also of ethanol (Blomqvist et al., 1997Go; Larsson et al., 2002Go; Ericsson et al., 2003Go). Since the subunit composition in all probability may influence the sensitivity to ethanol we have been investigating the role of these subunits in mediating the behavioural and neurochemical effects of ethanol.

Thus, we have previously found that neither dihydro-ß-erythroidine (DHßE), selective for the Formula nAChR, nor methyllycaconitine (MLA), selective for the Formula nAChR, antagonized the stimulatory or the DA-enhancing effects of ethanol in rodents (Larsson et al., 2002Go). Similarly, DHßE had no effect on alcohol consumption in rats (Lê et al., 2000Go), whereas DHßE antagonized nicotine-induced DA-overflow in N.Acc. in mice and rats (Larsson et al., 2002Go; Ericson et al., 2003Go). On the contrary, the peptide {alpha}-conotoxin MII ({alpha}CtxMII), selective for the Formula (Cartier et al., 1996Go), Formula (Cui et al., 2003Go), and Formula (Vailati et al., 1999Go; Champtiaux et al., 2002Go) nAChRs, antagonized the stimulatory, rewarding, and DA-enhancing effects of ethanol in rodents (Larsson et al., 2004Go). Taken together, this suggests that these effects of ethanol may be mediated via {alpha}CtxMII-sensitive receptors, e.g. Formula and/or Formula and/or Formula (Larsson et al., 2004Go), rather than Formula or Formula subunits of the nAChR (Larsson et al., 2002Go).

In our search for defining the nAChR subunits involved in the behavioural and neurochemical effects of ethanol we have turned to the peptide {alpha}-conotoxin PIA ({alpha}CtxPIA), which shows significantly higher selectivity for the Formula rather than the Formula and the Formula subunits (Dowell et al., 2003Go) (Fig. 1). This {alpha}CtxMII analogue consists of 18 amino acids, and like {alpha}CtxMII (which consists of 16 amino acids) it is stabilized by two disulfide bridges, which results in a complex three-dimensional structure.


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. The amino acid sequences for {alpha}-conotoxin MII, {alpha}-conotoxin PIA, and the {alpha}-conotoxin PIA-analogue. The eight similar amino acids between the three peptides are highlighted.

 
Since the access to {alpha}CtxMII and {alpha}CtxPIA, as well as to other {alpha}-conotoxins, is limited the first aim of the present study was to synthesize the {alpha}Ctx peptides and analogues using a modified synthetic procedure described for {alpha}CtxMII (Cartier et al., 1996Go). This procedure was used to synthesize {alpha}-conotoxin peptides with different nAChR selectivity than {alpha}CtxMII, e.g. {alpha}CtxPIA. The nAChR subunit selectivity of 4/7 {alpha}-conotoxins has been reported to reside to the central and the C-terminal part of the peptide, whereas the N-terminal amino acids appear to be of less importance (McIntosh et al., 1999Go; Arias and Blanton, 2000Go; Dutertre and Lewis, 2004Go; Everhart et al., 2004Go; Dutertre et al., 2005Go). Specifically, the bulky charged N-terminal protrusion of {alpha}CtxPIA has been suggested to be of less importance for its interaction with the {alpha}6 subunit of the nAChR (Chi et al., 2005Go). We therefore synthesized the analogue to {alpha}CtxPIA, {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue, where the first amino acid, i.e. arginine, in the N-terminal part was removed (Fig. 1). To maintain the selectivity to the Formula subunit, the remaining part, including the C-terminal of the peptide, was left intact.

The effects of synthesized {alpha}CtxMII and the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue on ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation in mice, as well as the effects of the synthesized {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue on ethanol-induced DA-overflow in N.Acc. in awake freely moving mice, were also investigated.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Peptide synthesis
Linear peptides The peptides were synthesized on a Rink amide resin (loading 1.20 mmol/g) using N-9-fluorenylmethoxycarboxyl (Fmoc) chemistry and O-(7-benzotriazole-1-yl)-1,1,3,3 tetramethyluronium tetrafluoroborate (TBTU) and N,N-diisopropylethyl amine (DIPEA) activation. The peptides were synthesized on a 0.24 mmol scale with standard amino acid side chain protection (Glu and Ser [t-Bu]; Asn and His [trityl] except on cysteine residues). Cysteine residues were protected in pairs with S-trityl on the first and third cysteines and S-acetamidomethyl on the second and fourth cysteines. Each residue was used in 5-fold excess and coupled for 60 min.

After the synthesis was completed the resin was washed with methanol (3 x 10 ml) and dried under reduced pressure.

The linear peptide amide was cleaved of the resin by treatment with 6 ml of trifluoroacetic acid/H2O/ethanedithiol/thioanisole (94.5/2.5/2.5/1 by volume) for 6 h at 20°C. The resin was rinsed twice with 6 ml of the same solution. The combined filtrate and washings were pooled and concentrated to dryness. The residue was washed two times with diethyl ether. The supernatant was discarded and the precipitated peptide powder was dried on the vacuum line.

Peptide cyclization To form a disulfide bridge between Cys and Cys (i.e. the first and third cysteines), the pelleted peptide was dissolved in 1.2 ml of H2O/acetonitrile/trifluoroacetic acid (95/5/0.1 by volume)/H2O (40/60 by volume), with gentle swirling (to avoid foaming). The linear peptide solution was added dropwise into 57 ml of H2O (pH 7.6 by solid Tris base). The solution was gently swirled at room temperature for 45 h when the reaction was judged to be complete by analytical HPLC using a Genesis C18 column (4µ, 15 cm x 4.6 mm; Jones Chromatography, Hengoed, USA) and a gradient from 5 to 95% of B-Buffer [H2O/acetonitrile/trifluoroacetic acid (95:5:0.1 by volume)] in acetonitrile as eluent (flow rate at 1 ml/min). The pH of the solution was adjusted to 2–3 by the addition of trifluoroacetic acid and the solution was freeze-dried. The monocyclic peptide was then purified by preparative HPLC using an Ace 5AQ column (25 cm x 21.2 mm; Advanced Chromatography Technologies, Aberdeen, UK) and a gradient from 5 to 95% of B-Buffer in acetonitrile as eluent (flow rate at 10 ml/min). The fractions containing the product were pooled and freeze-dried.

Removal of the S-acetamidomethyl groups and formation of the second disulfide bridge (Cys-Cys, i.e. the second and fourth cysteines) were carried out simultaneously by iodine oxidation. The monocyclic peptide was diluted in 3.5 ml of B-Buffer and added dropwise to 3.5 ml of a rapidly stirred solution of 20 mM iodine in H2O/trifluoroacetic acid/acetonitrile/MeOH (50:20:20:10 by volume) over 5.5 min at room temperature. This reaction was allowed to proceed for another 90 min and was thereafter terminated by the addition of a diluted aqueous solution of ascorbic acid (1 M, two drops). The solution was freeze-dried over night and the peptide was obtained as a powder. The peptide was dissolved in 450 µl of B-Buffer and was purified by preparative HPLC as described above. The purity of the peptide was analysed by analytical HPLC as described above. The peptide was thereafter freeze-dried and the amino acid sequence was analysed by FAB-MS (Einar Nilsson, Department of Organic Chemistry, Lund University, Sweden). The peptide was thereafter used in the animal experiment.

Animals Male adult NMRI mice weighing ~30–40 g, purchased from Charles River (Sulzfeld, Germany), were used. They were housed in groups of eight in standard plastic cages (Macrolon III; 400 x 250 x 150 mm) with free access to standard laboratory food (Harlan Teklad; Norfolk, England) and tap water. Upon arrival, the mice were allowed to habituate to the animal facilities for at least 1 week. A temperature of 20°C, humidity of 50%, and a 12/12 h light/dark cycle (lights switched on at 7:00 a.m.) were maintained in the animal room. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Experiments, Göteborg, Sweden.

Locomotor activity procedure
Surgical procedure Since {alpha}CtxMII and the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue might not pass the blood–brain barrier they were administered locally and bilaterally into the VTA. To facilitate this administration two bilateral guide cannulas, aiming at the VTA, were surgically implanted four days prior to the experiment. The mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (Isofluran Baxter; Univentor 400 Anaesthesia Unit, Univentor Ltd, Zejtun, Malta), placed in a Kopf stereotaxic instrument (David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA, USA) and kept on a body temperature-regulating heating pad to prevent hypothermia. The skull bone was exposed and two holes for the guide cannulas (stainless steel, length 10 mm, with an o.d./i.d. of 0.6/0.45 mm) and one for an anchoring screw were drilled. The coordinates for the VTA relative to the bregma were posterior –3.4 mm, lateral to midline ±0.5 mm, and ventral –1.0 mm from the brain surface (Franklin and Paxinos, 1996Go). The guide cannulas and the anchoring screw were stabilized with dental cement (Dentalon Plus; AgnThós AB, Lidingö, Sweden). After surgery the mice were kept in individual cages (Macrolon III) with food and water supplies ad libitum and were allowed to recover for 4 days before the locomotor activity testing. At time of the experiment a cannula for drug administration was inserted and extended another 3.8 mm ventrally beyond the tip of the guide cannula (Fig. 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Coronal mouse brain section showing probe placements in the nucleus accumbens and VTA. Coronal mouse brain section showing probe placements (illustrated by vertical lines) in the nucleus accumbens or within the VTA of 10 representative mice used in the present study. The number in the forebrain section indicates millimetres from bregma. +1.5 mm; nucleus accumbens. –3.4 mm; VTA. Reprinted from The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, K. B. J. Franklin and G. Paxinos, figure 18, Copyright (1996), with permission from Elsevier.

 
Locomotor activity measuring device Locomotor activity was registered in eight sound attenuated, ventilated, and dim lighted locomotor boxes (420 x 420 x 200 mm; Plexiglas®). Five by five rows of photocell beams, at the floor level of the box, creating photocell detection (Kungsbacka mät-och reglerteknik AB, Fjärås, Sweden) allowed a computer-based system to register the activity of the mice. The locomotor activity was defined as the accumulated number of new photocell beams interrupted during a 30 min period. Neither water nor food was available to the animal during the locomotor activity experiment.

Locomotor activity testing procedure On the day of the experiment the guide cannula was used to facilitate drug administration into the VTA. Before initiating the experiment a dummy cannula was carefully inserted and retreated into the guide cannula to remove clotted blood and to hamper spreading depression. Spreading depression occurs as a result of injuries to brain tissues, causing release of ions and other compounds, and thereby interfering with the animal's true behaviour. The mice were left to habituate individually in the locomotor box for 1 h before drug challenge and initialization of the experiment. Next, {alpha}CtxMII (5 nmol/1 µl), the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue (5, 10 and 20 nmol/1 µl), or Ringer solution was carefully administered bilaterally into the VTA using a cannnula connected to a 5 µl syringe (Kloehn, microsyringe; Skandinaviska Genetec AB, V. Frölunda, Sweden). The drug was administered over 1 min; the cannula was left in place for another minute and was then retracted and inserted to the contra-lateral guide cannula and the drug administration procedure was repeated. The mice were returned to the locomotor activity boxes after drug administration. Twenty minutes later ethanol (1.75 g/kg) or vehicle [0.9% sodium chloride solution (saline); 12 ml/kg] was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.). The mice in each group received drug treatment only once. To avoid any influence of injection-induced hypermotility the measurement of locomotor activity started 5 min after the ethanol/vehicle injection and was subsequently measured for 30 min and the accumulated counts during this period were then compared between groups. In the locomotor activity experiments with {alpha}CtxMII 6–8 mice were included in each group. In the experiments with {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue 6–10 observations were included in each group, except from Ringer–NaCl (n = 17) and Ringer–EtOH (n = 20) due to pooling from two experiments. Neither food nor water was available to the mice during the locomotor activity experiment.

Microdialysis procedure
Surgical procedure The mice were implanted with both a microdialysis probe (Waters et al., 1993Go) aiming at the N.Acc. for measuring extracellular DA levels and an ipsilateral guide cannula aiming at the VTA for local drug administration. The location of the probe and the ipsilateral guide cannula was alternated to both the left and right side of the brain. The coordinates for N.Acc. relative to the bregma were anterior +1.5 mm, lateral to midline ±0.8, and ventral –4.7 mm and the coordinates for VTA relative to the bregma were posterior –3.4 mm, lateral to midline ±0.5 mm, and ventral –1.0 mm from the brain surface (Franklin and Paxinos, 1996Go). At time of the experiment the cannula was extended another 3.8 mm ventrally beyond the tip of the guide cannula for drug administration.

The surgical procedure was performed as described above, where first the probe was slowly lowered into position and anchored to the screw in the skull bone with dental cement (Dentalon Plus; Angthós AB). Second the guide cannula was lowered into position and was anchored to the probe with dental cement (Dentalon Plus; Angthós AB). The mice were housed individually in the same type of plastic cages (Macrolon III) as before the operation with food and water supplies ad libitum. The animals were allowed to recover for 4 days before the microdialysis experiment. The exposed tip of the dialysis membrane (20 000 kDa cut off with an o.d./i.d. of 310/220 µm, HOSPAL, Gambro, Lund, Sweden) of the probe was 1 mm.

Microdialysis drug treatment paradigm The microdialysis technique enables concentration measurements of neurotransmitters in awake, freely moving animals. In these experiments the effects of the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue on ethanol-induced DA-overflow in the N.Acc. were investigated.

On the day of the experiment immediately before start of the experiment, a dummy cannula was carefully inserted and retracted into the guide cannula to remove clotted blood and to hamper spreading depression. Next, the probe was connected to a microperfusion pump (U-864 Syringe Pump; AgnThós AB) and perfused with Ringer solution at a rate of 1.5 µl/min. After 1 h of habituation to the microdialysis perfusion set-up, perfusion samples were collected every 20 min. After collection of five samples, ethanol (1.75 g/kg, i.p.) was administered. Three hours later the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue (5 nmol/1 µl) or Ringer solution was administered locally into the VTA during 1 min; the cannula was left in place for another minute and was then rejected. Twenty minutes after the local drug administration an additional ethanol (1.75 g/kg, i.p.) or vehicle (saline: 12 ml/kg, i.p.) injection followed, and another four samples were collected. A total of 7–10 mice were included in each group. Neither water nor food was available to the animal during the microdialysis experiment.

Biochemical assay The DA levels in the dialysates were determined by means of HPLC with electrochemical detection (HPLC-EC). A pump (Gyncotec P580A; Kovalent AB, V. Frölunda, Sweden), an ion exchange column (2.0 x 100 mm, Prodigy 3 µm, Skandinaviska GeneTec AB, Kungsbacka, Sweden), and a detector (Antec Decade; Antec Leyden, Zoeterwoude, The Netherlands) equipped with a VT-03 flow cell (Antec Leyden) were used. The mobile phase (pH 5.6) consisting of sulfonic acid 10 mM, citric acid 200 mM, sodium citrate 200 mM, 10% EDTA, and 30% MeOH, which was vacuum filtered by using a 0.2 µm membrane filter (GH Polypro; PALL Gelman Laboratory, Lund, Sweden), was used. The mobile phase was delivered at a flow rate of 0.2 ml/min passing a degasser (Kovalent AB), and the analyte was oxidized at +0.4 V.

Verification of probe and/or guide cannula placement After the experiments were completed, the location of the probe, cannula, or both was verified. The mice were decapitated, probes were perfused with pontamine sky blue 6BX to facilitate probe identification, and the brains were mounted on a vibroslice device (752M Vibroslice; Campden Instruments Ltd, Loughborough, UK). The brains were cut in 50 µm sections and the location of the probe or cannula was determined by gross observation using light microscopy. Only mice with probe placement in the N.Acc. and/or guide cannula placement in the VTA were included in the statistical analysis (Fig. 2).

Drugs {alpha}CtxMII and the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue were synthesized (cf. Peptide synthesis) and at the experiment the drugs were dissolved in Ringer solution: 140 mM NaCl, 1.2 mM CaCl2, 3.0 mM KCl, and 1.0 mM MgCl2. The dose of {alpha}CtxMII (5 nmol/1 µl) used was base on dose-finding experiments to select the highest dose that did not affect locomotor activity per se (data not shown), and doses of 5, 10, and 20 nmol/1 µl were used for the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue during the locomotor activity testing. The dose of 5 nmol/1 µl for the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue was used, since the higher doses (10 and 20 nmol) did not affected locomotor activity per se and therefore to be co-adherent with previous experiments with {alpha}CtxMII.

Administration of {alpha}CtxMII, the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue, or Ringer solution was performed locally into the VTA at a volume of 1 µl ethanol (VWR International AB, Stockholm, Sweden) was diluted in a 0.9% sodium chloride solution to a 15% (weight/volume) and was administrated i.p.

Statistical analyses The data from the locomotor activity studies were evaluated by one- or two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Fisher protected least significant difference test (PLSD) for comparisons between treatments.

The microdialysis data were analysed by paired or unpaired t-tests. The baseline DA concentration preceding the first ethanol-induced increase in DA-overflow was defined as the averaged concentration of the two consecutive samples obtained before ethanol challenge (time point 0 min) and the peak increase was defined as the averaged concentration of the two consecutive samples obtained at 80 and 100 min. The baseline DA concentration preceding the second ethanol-induced increase in DA-overflow was defined as the averaged concentration of the two consecutive samples obtained at 160 and 180 min and the peak increase was defined as the averaged concentration of the two consecutive samples obtained at 220 and 240 min. Paired t-tests were used to investigate the maximum DA increase for the respective peaks in each treatment group. Differences between treatment groups in ethanol-induced DA-overflow were analysed by unpaired t-test. A P-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant and a P-value greater than 0.05 was considered not significant (n.s.). Error bars in the figures represent standard error of the mean (SEM).

Verification of probe and or cannula(s) placement Only mice with correct cannula placement into the VTA and/or probe placement within the N.Acc. were included in the statistical analysis. The location of the microdialysis probes within the N.Acc. (Fig. 2) and the ventral tegmental guide cannula (Fig. 2) were verified by gross observation, using light microscopy.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Peptide synthesis
The minor modifications to the already existing synthesis protocol (Cartier et al., 1996Go) were successful. Pure products, i.e. the correctly cyclized peptides {alpha}CtxMII and the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue, were obtained in satisfactory yields (>95 and >90%, respectively). The purity and identity of the peptides were confirmed by HPLC and FAB-MS analyses, respectively. In addition, co-injection of synthesized and purchased {alpha}CtxMII on analytical HPLC showed an identical elution profile.

Locomotor activity experiments with synthesized {alpha}-conotoxin mii
The results of the effect of synthesized {alpha}CtxMII (5 nmol/1 µl) on ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation in mice are presented in Fig. 3. A statistically significant overall effect of treatment was observed [F(3,24) = 3.067, P = 0.0472, one-way ANOVA]. Ethanol (1.75 g/kg, i.p.) caused a marked and statistically significant locomotor stimulation in mice in comparison with vehicle-treated animals (P < 0.05, Fisher PLSD). {alpha}CtxMII (5 nmol/1 µl, bilaterally administered into the VTA, –20 min) had no effect per se on locomotor activity (n.s. compared with Ringer solution–vehicle, Fisher PLSD), but statistically significantly reduced the ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation (P < 0.05 compared with Ringer solution–Ethanol, Fisher PLSD) [the locomotor activity did not differ from vehicle-treated animals (n.s., Fisher PLSD)].


Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Local administration of synthesized {alpha}-conotoxin MII into the VTA antagonizes the ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. Effects of synthesized {alpha}-conotoxin MII (5 nmol), bilaterally and locally administered into the VTA, on ethanol-induced (EtOH, 1.75 g/kg, i.p.) locomotor stimulation in mice. Shown are the mean values ± SEM of 6–8 observations in each group. (*P < 0.05, compared with Ringer+NaCl, if not otherwise is indicated, *P < 0.05, comparing Ringer+EtOH with {alpha}-CtxMII+EtOH, Fisher PLSD test, after significant analysis of variance). Ringer = Ringer solution.

 
Locomotor activity experiments with the synthesized {alpha}-conotoxin PIA-analogue
The results of the effect of the synthesized {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue (5, 10, 20 nmol/1 µl) on ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation in mice are presented in Fig. 4. A statistically significant overall effect of treatment was observed [F(1,79) = 19.9, P < 0.001, two-way ANOVA]. Collapsed over all doses of the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue used, ethanol (1.75 g/kg, i.p.) caused a statistically significant locomotor stimulation in the mice in comparison with saline-treated animals (P < 0.001, Fisher PLSD). The {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue (5, 10, and 20 nmol/1 µl, bilaterally administered into the VTA; –20 min) in the doses tested had no statistically significant effect per se on locomotor activity [F(3,37) = 2.37, n.s., one-way ANOVA, effect of treatment]. Neither did any of the doses reduce the ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation in the mice (n.s., Fisher PLSD).


Figure 4
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Local administration of the synthesized {alpha}-conotoxin PIA-analogue into the VTA does not antagonize the ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation. Effects of the synthesized {alpha}-conotoxin PIA-analogue (5, 10 and 20 nmol), bilaterally and locally administered into the VTA, on ethanol-induced (EtOH, 1.75 g/kg, i.p.) locomotor stimulation in mice. Shown are the mean values ± SEM of 6–10 observations in each group, except from Ringer–NaCl (n = 17) and Ringer–EtOH (n = 20) due to pooling from two experiments. Ringer = Ringer solution.

 
Microdialysis experiments with synthesized {alpha}-conotoxin pia
The results of the effect of the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue (5 nmol/1 µl) or Ringer on ethanol-induced DA-overflow in N.Acc. in awake, freely moving mice are presented in Fig. 5. Statistical analysis of the data showed that the first ethanol administration (1.75 g/kg i.p.) statistically significantly increased the extracellular DA levels in N.Acc. in both treatment groups in comparison with the preceding baseline concentrations. The maximal DA levels in N.Acc. were observed ~90 min after the ethanol administration. EtOH–Ringer–EtOH (+67.9%; P < 0.01, paired t-test), EtOH–{alpha}CtxPIA-analogue–EtOH (+53.7%; P < 0.01, paired t-test). These peaks were not significantly different in amplitude (unpaired t-test).


Figure 5
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Local administration of the synthesized {alpha}-conotoxin PIA-analogue into the VTA does not antagonizes the ethanol-induced accumbal dopamine-overflow. Effect of the synthesized {alpha}-conotoxin PIA-analogue (5 nmol), unilaterally and locally administered into the VTA, on ethanol-induced (EtOH, 1.75 g/kg, i.p.) dopamine-overflow in nucleus accumbens in mice measured by in vivo microdialysis. Ethanol was administered the first time at 0 min; Ringer or {alpha}-conotoxin PIA was administered at 180 min. After 20 min from the beginning of drug administration ethanol was administered the second time (EtOH, 1.75 g/kg, i.p.). Shown are mean values ± SEM of 7–10 observations in each group. Ringer = Ringer solution.

 
A second administration of ethanol (1.75 g/kg, i.p.), after administration of Ringer solution (1 µl, unilaterally into the VTA; –20 min) or the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue, also caused a statistically significant increase in accumbal DA levels (P < 0.05, compared with the preceding baseline in both treatment groups). EtOH–Ringer–EtOH (+59.9 ± 8.4%; P < 0.001, paired t-test), EtOH–{alpha}CtxPIA-analogue–EtOH +29.2 ± 10.7%; P < 0.05, paired t-test). Neither these peaks were significantly different in amplitude (P > 0.05, unpaired t-test).

In a separate control experiment, the administration schedule EtOH–Ringer–Saline was used. Also in this experiment ethanol produced an increase in DA-overflow but Ringer/Saline did not cause any significant effects on DA-overflow. In a second control experiment, the administration schedule Saline–{alpha}CtxPIA-analogue–Saline was used. None of these treatments caused a statistically significantly change in accumbal DA levels (P > 0.05, paired t-tests, data not shown). These results show that neither the cannula insertion, i.p. injection, volume of ringer infused, nor {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue, per se, had any significant effects on ethanol-induced DA-overflow in N.Acc..


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In previous publications we have shown that the Formula and/or Formula and/or Formula (using {alpha}CtxMII) rather than the Formula or Formula (using DHßE or MLA respectively) subunits of the nAChRs may be involved in mediating the stimulatory, rewarding, and DA-enhancing effects of ethanol (Larsson et al., 2002Go, 2004Go). Here we provide additional information on the functional role of some subunits (n.b. the Formula ) of the nAChRs, for the behavioural and neurochemical effects of ethanol, using synthesized {alpha}CtxMII and the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue. The {alpha}CtxPIA, being an analogue of {alpha}CtxMII and consisting of 18 amino acids with two disulfide bridges, has been reported to have higher selectivity for the Formula than for the Formula and/or Formula subunits (Dowell et al., 2003Go).

It cannot be excluded that the synthesized {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue is different from {alpha}CtxPIA. However, this appears less likely since the nAChR subunit selectivity of 4/7 {alpha}-conotoxins has been reported to involve the amino acid residues in the central and the C-terminal part of the peptide, whereas the N-terminal appears to be of less importance (McIntosh et al., 1999Go; Arias and Blanton, 2000Go; Dutertre and Lewis, 2004Go; Everhart et al., 2004Go; Dutertre et al., 2005Go). Specifically, the bulky charged N-terminal protrusion of {alpha}CtxPIA has been suggested to be of less importance for its interaction with the {alpha}6 subunit of the nAChR (Chi et al., 2005Go). In the present series of experiments an analogue to {alpha}CtxPIA, the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue, was used in which the N-terminal arginine had been removed. To maintain the selectivity to the Formula subunit of the nAChR, the remaining part including the central amino acids and the C-terminal of the peptide was left intact. Consequently, by comparing the effects of synthesized {alpha}CtxMII and the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue in their interaction with ethanol, the role of the Formula subunit for the behavioural and neurochemical effects of ethanol can be determined.

We show that the modified synthetic method allowed efficient production of {alpha}CtxMII (Cartier et al., 1996Go) and the {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue. Results from analytical HPLC and FAB-MS analysis confirmed the purity and the identity, respectively, of the synthesized peptides.

First we found that local administration of synthesized {alpha}CtxMII antagonized ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation, which besides confirming our previous results with the commercially available {alpha}CtxMII (Larsson et al., 2004Go) indicates that the {alpha}CtxMII sensitive receptors (i.e. the Formula and/or Formula and/or Formula subunits) play an important role for some of the behavioural and neurochmical effects of ethanol. On the contrary, the synthesized {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue, assumably also selective to the Formula subunits, did neither antagonize ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation nor DA-overflow in mice. This result suggests {alpha}CtxMII- and not {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue-sensitive receptors in the VTA, i.e. the {alpha}3 subunit, to be involved in mediating the stimulatory and accumbal DA-enhancing effects of ethanol in mice. The findings that 18-methoxycoronaridine, selective for the Formula nAChR, reduces ethanol intake in rats (Maisonneuve and Glick, 2003Go) further support the involvement of the {alpha}3 subunits of the nAChR for the rewarding profile of ethanol. In addition the expression of the {alpha}3 subunit has been reported to be localized on DAergic neurons in the VTA (Klink et al., 2001Go), a brain region involved in brain reward (for a review see Larsson and Engel, 2004Go).

It should be considered that, in addition to nAChRs, muscarinic acetylcholine receptors have been shown to be present in the VTA (Yeomans and Baptista, 1997Go; Yeomans et al., 2001Go; Forster et al., 2002Go; Miller et al., 2005Go). Interestingly, muscarinic acetylcholine receptors have been demonstrated to play a role in natural reward (Yeomans and Baptista, 1997Go; Rada et al., 2000Go) and could consequently have an additional role in mediating the stimulatory and DA-enhancing effects of ethanol. It should be emphasized that the rewarding profile of ethanol is orchestrated by several other neurohumoral systems including glutamate, 5-HT, GABA, and opioid peptides (Engel et al., 1992Go; Koob, 1992Go). Thus, the possibility that the effects of {alpha}CtxMII could be due to non-nicotinic receptors cannot be excluded.

From this series of experiments it cannot be determined whether the stimulatory, rewarding, and DA-enhancing effects of ethanol mediated via nAChR are exerted via a direct interaction of ethanol with nAChR in the VTA and/or indirectly via increased extracellular ACh in the VTA. Proof of concept for the latter hypothesis show a concomitant release of ACh in the VTA and DA in the N.Acc. upon voluntary ethanol intake (Larsson et al., 2005Go), thus implicating that a cholinergic input to the VTA mediates the rewarding effects of ethanol. The cholinergic excitatory input to the VTA, foremost originating in the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and laterodorsal tegmental nucleus (Woolf, 1991Go; Butcher and Woolf, 2003Go), has been suggested to be an important part of neural circuits mediating both natural as well as drug-induced reward (Lanca et al., 2000Go; Rada et al., 2000Go). However, it cannot be excluded that ethanol, e.g. as a co-agonist to ACh on nAChR (Marszalec et al., 1999Go), interacts directly with nAChR on neurons, e.g. dopaminergic cellbodies, in the VTA.

In conclusion, the present data suggest that the stimulatory and DA-enhancing effects of ethanol might be mediated via {alpha}CtxMII- rather than {alpha}CtxPIA-analogue-sensitive receptors in the VTA, suggesting an important mediating role for the Formula and/or Formula rather than the Formula nAChRs. To further establish which subunit compositions of the nAChR are involved in stimulatory, rewarding, and DA-enhancing effects of ethanol, additional synthetic {alpha}CtxMII peptide analogues with selectivity for the Formula and/or Formula, rather than the Formula nAChR, should be synthesized and tested in the models for ethanol-induced reward and reinforcement.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
The authors are grateful for the excellent help from Mrs Gun Andersson and Mr Kenn Johannessen. This work was supported by grants from the Swedish Research Council (no. 4247 and no. 621-2004-4571) and NIDA 2 R01 10765-04A1, the Alcohol Research Council of the Swedish Alcohol Retailing Monopoly, The Swedish Labour Market Insurance (AFA), Wilhelm and Martina Lundgrens Scientific Foundation, Rådman and Fru Ernst Collianders Foundation, the Tornspiran Foundation, the Lundbeck Foundation, Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (no. 98.176), The Adlerbertska Foundation, the Filip Lundbergs Foundation, The Längman Cultural Foundation.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Arias, H. R. and Blanton, M. P. (2000) alpha-Conotoxins. International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology 32, 1017–1028.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Ayers, J., Ruff, C. F. and Templer, D. I. (1976) Alcoholism, cigarette smoking, coffee drinking and extraversion. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 37, 983–385.[Web of Science][Medline]

Batel, P., Pessione, F., Maitre, C. et al. (1995) Relationship between alcohol and tobacco dependencies among alcoholics who smoke. Addiction 90, 977–980.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Bien, T. H. and Burge, R. (1990) Smoking and drinking: a review of the literature. The International journal of the addictions 25, 1429–1454.[Web of Science][Medline]

Blomqvist, O., Ericson, M., Engel, J. A. et al. (1997) Accumbal dopamine overflow after ethanol: localization of the antagonizing effect of mecamylamine. European journal of pharmacology 334, 149–156.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Butcher, L. L. and Woolf, N. J. (2003) Cholinergic neurons and networks revisited. In The Rat Nervous System, third edition, pp. 1257–1268. Elsevier, USA.

Carmody, T. P., Brischetto, C. S., Matarazzo, J. D. et al. (1985) Co-occurrent use of cigarettes, alcohol, and coffee in healthy, community-living men and women. Health psychology 4, 323–335.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Cartier, G. E., Yoshikami, D., Gray, W. R. et al. (1996) A new alpha-conotoxin which targets alpha3beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. The Journal of biological chemistry 271, 7522–7528.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Champtiaux, N., Han, Z. Y., Bessis, A. et al. (2002) Distribution and pharmacology of alpha 6-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors analyzed with mutant mice. Journal of Neuroscience 22, 1208–1217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Charpantier, E., Barneoud, P., Moser, P. et al. (1998) Nicotinic acetylcholine subunit mRNA expression in dopaminergic neurons of the rat substantia nigra and ventral tegmental area. Neuroreport 9, 3097–3101.[Web of Science][Medline]

Chi, S.-W., Lee, S.-H., Kim, D.-H. et al. (2005) Solution structure of alpha-conotoxin PIA, a novel antagonist of alpha6 subunit containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 338, 1990–1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Clarke, P. B., Fu, D. S., Jakubovic, A. et al. (1988) Evidence that mesolimbic dopaminergic activation underlies the locomotor stimulant action of nicotine in rats. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 246, 701–708.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Clarke, P. B. and Pert, A. (1985) Autoradiographic evidence for nicotine receptors on nigrostriatal and mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons. Brain Research 348, 355–358.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Cui, C., Booker, T. K., Allen, R. S. et al. (2003) The beta3 nicotinic receptor subunit: a component of alpha-conotoxin MII-binding nicotinic acetylcholine receptors that modulate dopamine release and related behaviors. Journal of Neuroscience 23, 11045–11053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Di Chiara, G. (2000) Role of dopamine in the behavioural actions of nicotine related to addiction. European journal of pharmacology 393, 295–314.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

DiFranza, J. R.and Guerrera, M. P. (1990) Alcoholism and smoking. Journal of studies on alcohol 51, 130–135.[Web of Science][Medline]

Dowell, C., Olivera, B. M., Garrett, J. E. et al. (2003) Alpha-conotoxin PIA is selective for alpha6 subunit-containing nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Journal of Neuroscience 23, 8445–8452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dutertre, S. and Lewis, R. J. (2004) Computational approaches to understand alpha-conotoxin interactions at neural nicotinic receptors. European journal of biochemistry 271, 2327–2334.[Web of Science][Medline]

Dutertre, S., Nicke, A. and Lewis, R. J. (2005) Beta2 subunit contribution to 4/7 alpha-conotoxin binding to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. The Journal of biological chemistry 280, 30460–30468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Engel, J. A., Fahlke, C., Hard, E. et al. (1992) Serotonergic and dopaminergic involvement in ethanol intake. Clinical neuropharmacology 15, 64A–65A.

Ericson, M., Molander, A., Löf, E. et al. (2003) Ethanol elevates accumbal dopamine levels via indirect activation of ventral tegmental nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. European journal of pharmacology 467, 85–93.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Everhart, D., Cartier, G. E., Malhotra, A. et al. (2004) Determinants of potency on alpha-conotoxin MII, a peptide antagonist of neuronal nicotinic receptors. Biochemistry 43, 2732–2737.[CrossRef][Medline]

Forman, S. A., Righi, D. L. and Miller, K. V. (1989) Ethanol increases agonist affinity for nicotinic receptors from Torpedo. Biochimica et biophysica acta 987, 95–103.[Medline]

Forman, S. A. and Zhou, Q. (1999) Novel modulation of a nicotinic receptor channel mutant reveals that the open state is stabilized by ethanol. Molecular pharmacology 55, 102–108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Forster, G. L., Yeomans, J. S., Takeuchi, J. et al. (2002) M5 muscarinic receptors are required for prolonged accumbal dopamine release after electrical stimulation of the pons in mice. Journal of Neuroscience 22, RC190.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Franklin, K. B. J. and Paxinos, G. (1996) The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates. Academic Press, New York.

Grant, B. F. (1998) Age at smoking onset and its association with alcohol consumption and DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey. Journal of substance abuse 10, 59–73.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Istvan, J. and Matarazzo, J. D. (1984) Tobacco, alcohol, and caffeine use: a review of their interrelationships. Psychological bulletin 95, 301–326.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Klink, R., de Kerchove d'Exaerde, A., Zoli, M. et al. (2001) Molecular and physiological diversity of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the midbrain dopaminergic nuclei. Journal of Neuroscience 21, 1452–1463.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Koob, G. F. (1992) Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways. Trends in pharmacological sciences 13, 177–184.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lanca, A. J., Adamson, K. L., Coen, K. M. et al. (2000) The pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus and the role of cholinergic neurons in nicotine self-administration in the rat: a correlative neuroanatomical and behavioral study. Neuroscience 96, 735–742.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Larsson, A., Svensson, L., Söderpalm, B. et al. (2002) Role of different nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in mediating behavioral and neurochemical effects of ethanol in mice. Alcohol 28, 157–167.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Larsson, A. and Engel, J. A. (2004) Neurochemical and behavioral studies on ethanol and nicotine interactions. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 27, 713–720.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Larsson, A., Jerlhag, E., Svensson, L. et al. (2004) Is an alpha-conotoxin MII sensitive mechanism involved in the neurochemical, stimulatory and rewarding effects of ethanol. Alcohol 34, 239–146.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Larsson, A., Edström, L., Svensson, L. et al. (2005) Voluntary ethanol intake increases extracellular acetylcholine levels in the ventral tegmental area in the rat. Alcohol and alcoholism 40, 349–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Le Novere, N., Corringer, P. J. and Changeux, J. P. (2002) The diversity of subunit composition in nAChRs: evolutionary origins, physiologic and pharmacologic consequences. Journal of neurobiology 53, 447–456.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Lê, A. D., Corrigall, W. A., Harding, J. W. et al. (2000) Involvement of nicotinic receptors in alcohol self-administration. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research 24, 155–163.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Maisonneuve, I. M. and Glick, S. D. (2003) Anti-addictive actions of an iboga alkaloid congener: a novel mechanism for a novel treatment. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior 75, 607–618.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Marszalec, W., Aistrup, G. L. and Narahashi, T. (1999) Ethanol-nicotine interactions at alpha-bungarotoxin-insensitive nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in rat cortical neurons. Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research 23, 439–445.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

McIntosh, J. M., Santos, A. D. and Olivera, B. M. (1999) Conus peptides targeted to specific nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. Annual review of biochemistry 68, 59–88.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Miller, N. S. and Gold, M. S. (1998) Comorbid cigarette and alcohol addiction: epidemiology and treatment. Journal of addictive diseases 17, 55–66.[Web of Science][Medline]

Miller, A. D., Forster, G. L., Yeomans, J. S. et al. (2005) Midbrain muscarinic receptors modulate morphine-induced accumbal and striatal dopamine efflux in the rat. Neuroscience 136, 531–538.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Nicke, A., Wonnacott, S. and Lewis, R.J. (2004) Alpha-conotoxins as tools for the elucidation of structure and function of neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. European journal of biochemistry 271, 2305–2319.[Web of Science][Medline]

Rada, P. V., Mark, G. P., Yeomans, J. J. et al. (2000) Acetylcholine release in ventral tegmental area by hypothalamic self-stimulation, eating, and drinking. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior 65, 375–379.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Rose, J. E., Brauer, L. H., Behm, F. M. et al. (2004) Psychopharmacological interactions between nicotine and ethanol. Nicotine and tobacco research 6, 133–144.[CrossRef]

Vailati, S., Hanke, W., Bejan, A. et al. (1999) Functional alpha6-containing nicotinic receptors are present in chick retina. Molecular pharmacology 56, 11–19.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Walton, R. G. (1972) Smoking and alcoholism: a brief report. The American journal of psychiatry 128, 1455–1456.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Waters, N., Lagerkvist, S., Lofberg, L. et al. (1993) The dopamine D3 receptor and autoreceptor preferring antagonists (+)-AJ76 and (+)-UH232; a microdialysis study. European journal of pharmacology 242, 151–163.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wonnacott, S., Drasdo, A., Sanderson, E. et al. (1990) Presynaptic nicotinic receptors and the modulation of transmitter release. Ciba Foundation symposium 152, 87–105.[Medline]

Woolf, N. J. (1991) Cholinergic systems in mammalian brain and spinal cord. Progress in neurobiology 37, 475–524.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Wu, G., Tonner, P. H. and Miller, K. W. (1994) Ethanol stabilizes the open channel state of the Torpedo nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Molecular pharmacology 45, 102–108.[Abstract]

Yeomans, J. and Baptista, M. (1997) Both nicotinic and muscarinic receptors in ventral tegmental area contribute to brain-stimulation reward. Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior 57, 915–21.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Yeomans, J., Forster, G. and Blaha, C. (2001) M5 muscarinic receptors are needed for slow activation of dopamine neurons and for rewarding brain stimulation. Life sciences 68, 2449–56.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]

Yoshida, K., Engel, J. and Liljequist, S. (1982) The effect of chronic ethanol administration of high affinity 3H-nicotinic binding in rat brain. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology 321, 74–76.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. Ericson, E. Lof, R. Stomberg, and B. Soderpalm
The Smoking Cessation Medication Varenicline Attenuates Alcohol and Nicotine Interactions in the Rat Mesolimbic Dopamine System
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2009; 329(1): 225 - 230.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
Y. Tizabi, L. Bai, R. L. Copeland JR., and R. E. Taylor
Combined effects of systemic alcohol and nicotine on dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens shell
Alcohol Alcohol., September 1, 2007; 42(5): 413 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. Steensland, J. A. Simms, J. Holgate, J. K. Richards, and S. E. Bartlett
Varenicline, an {alpha}4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor partial agonist, selectively decreases ethanol consumption and seeking
PNAS, July 24, 2007; 104(30): 12518 - 12523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
41/5/486    most recent
agl049v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JERLHAG, E.
Right arrow Articles by ENGEL, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by JERLHAG, E.
Right arrow Articles by ENGEL, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?