Alcohol and Alcoholism Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 35-39, 2003
© 2003 Medical Council on Alcohol
REWARD CRAVING AND WITHDRAWAL RELIEF CRAVING: ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT MOTIVATIONAL PATHWAYS TO ALCOHOL INTAKE
1 Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Departments of
2 Clinical Psychology and
3 Biostatistics, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim and
4 Department of Psychiatry of the Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany
Received 31 December 2001; in revised form 11 June 2002; accepted 28 June 2002
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aims: Craving for the rewarding effects of alcohol may be evoked by conditioned alcohol-like effects whereas conditioned compensatory responses may induce withdrawal relief craving. We tested the hypothesis that drinking in positive emotional states is associated with appetitive reactions to alcohol-associated cues and contributes to reward craving, while conditioned withdrawal is associated with drinking in negative situations and distressful, obsessive preoccupations with alcohol. Methods: In 38 detoxified alcoholics, the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale was used to assess the craving factors impaired control, interference with social functioning and obsession. Affective responses to alcohol-associated visual stimuli were measured with the affect-modulated eyeblink startle reflex, positive and negative drinking situations with the Inventory of Drinking Situations (IDS) and withdrawal-like symptoms preceding alcohol intake with the revised Clinical Institute Assessment for Alcohol Scale (CIWA-Ar). Results: Appetitive reactions to alcohol-associated cues correlated positively with drinking in positive situations and contributed significantly to the craving factor interference with social and work functioning. The severity of withdrawal-like symptoms preceding alcohol intake contributed to the craving factor obsession; however, contrary to our hypothesis, this measure of conditioned withdrawal correlated with drinking not only in negative but also in positive situations. Conclusions: Drinking in positive and negative situations, appetitive reactions to alcohol and withdrawal-like symptoms contributed differentially to the craving factors obsession and interference, supporting the notion of different craving factors with separate underlying mechanisms.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Craving for alcohol can be elicited by exposure to alcohol and alcohol-associated stimuli in abstinent alcoholics (Niaura et al., 1988
-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic neurotransmission. Acute alcohol intake potentiates GABAergic sedation and inhibits glutamatergic excitation (Koob, 1992
An alternative hypothesis suggests that alcohol craving is induced by the mood-enhancing, positive-reinforcing effects of alcohol and drug intake (Stewart et al., 1984
; Wise, 1988
; Koob and Le Moal, 1997
). Craving for the rewarding effects of alcohol can be mediated by opioidergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission in the ventral striatum (Spanagel et al., 1992
; Di Chiara, 1995
; Volpicelli et al., 1995
). Associative learning may transform positive mood states and previously neutral environmental stimuli into alcohol-associated cues that acquire positive motivational salience and induce reward craving (Robinson and Berridge, 1993
). Among alcoholics, the appetitive character of alcohol-associated visual stimuli was indicated by an attenuation of the eyeblink startle response (Mucha et al., 2000
; Grüsser et al., 2002
). The motivational effects of positive mood states and external alcohol-associated cues on alcohol craving and consumption may be blocked by naltrexone (Monti et al., 1999
).
Anton et al. (1996)
constructed the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (OCDS) which focuses on obsessivecompulsive aspects of alcohol craving. A factor analysis revealed that three factors contribute to alcohol craving as assessed with the OCDS: control impairment, obsession and interference. Obsession describes the distress or anxiety caused by a preoccupation with alcohol-associated ideas or impulses, control impairment the lack of success in the control of alcohol intake, and interference the degree of interference with social or work functioning (Roberts et al., 1999
). Naltrexone medication was associated with reduced scores for control impairment but not the other two craving factors (Roberts et al., 1999
). Recently, Verheul et al. (1999)
suggested that reward craving, withdrawal relief craving and obsessive craving are not mutually exclusive concepts, but, rather, describe different types of alcohol craving with distinguishable neurobiological correlates. The individual response to naltrexone or acamprosate medication may depend upon the relative strength of the respective alcohol craving type and its neurobiological foundation.
For the clinical identification of alcohol craving types, we measured different aspects of alcohol craving with the Obsessive Compulsive Drinking Scale (Anton et al., 1996
). We tested the hypothesis of Verheul et al. (1999)
that subjects who crave for the rewarding effects of alcohol mainly consume alcohol in emotionally positive situations and show appetitive responses to alcohol cues, whereas subjects suffering from withdrawal relief craving drink mainly in negative situations and report unpleasant, withdrawal-like symptoms preceding alcohol intake. We also tested the hypothesis that negative mood states and conditioned withdrawal contribute to distressful obsessive alcohol craving (factor obsession in the OCDS) and that appetitive reactions to alcohol cues and drinking in positive situations contribute to control impairment and interference with social and work functioning.
| SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Subjects
Thirty-eight abstinent alcoholics who fulfilled diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence according to ICD-10 (World Health Organization, 1992
7 days. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Mannheim Faculty of Medicine at the University of Heidelberg and informed written consent was obtained from all participants.
|
Psychological testing
On the test day, patients were first interviewed and then the eyeblink startle response was measured in the psychophysiological laboratory. Craving for alcohol was measured with the OCDS (Anton et al., 1996
tt = 0.926. The non-parametric correlation coefficient
was selected, because of the non-normal distribution and the ordinal nature of the CIWA scales. To test for the adequacy of the linear interpretation of the CIWA total score, we transformed it to a quantitative discrete scale and correlated this with the original total scores. The correlation of
= 0.915 shows the adequacy of our linear interpretation of the CIWA total score.
Psychophysiological assessment
The appetitive or aversive nature of alcohol-associated cues was measured with the affectively modulated eyeblink startle response (Lang et al., 1990
). A potentiation of the startle response by the induction of negative mood states and an attenuation of the startle response by positive mood states have been widely described in studies among healthy volunteers and patients with different neuropsychiatric disorders (Vrana et al., 1988
; Bradley et al., 1990
; Cook et al., 1992
). In alcoholics, two studies reported an attenuation of the startle response during the presentation of alcohol-associated stimuli, compared with emotionally negative and neutral stimuli (Mucha et al., 2000
; Grüsser et al., 2002
).
Eight slides showing alcoholic beverages were randomly presented along with eight neutral, eight unpleasant and eight pleasant objects and 30 startle probes. The pleasant, unpleasant and neutral pictures were taken from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS; Lang, 1995
) and were separately selected for male and female subjects. Pleasant, unpleasant, neutral and alcohol-associated stimuli were matched for arousal ratings; valence and arousal data were taken from the IAPS and controlled for in our patient sample. Alcohol craving was rated with the OCDS immediately before picture presentation.
The subjects were first prepared for recording from the left orbicularis oculi. To evoke the startle eyeblink response, white noise was presented via headphones with 95 dB while the subjects viewed the visual stimuli (Geier et al., 2000
). Visual stimuli were presented for 7.5 s at intervals of 21 s on a high-resolution monitor (35.8 cm) of an Acer travelmate (7100TE) laptop placed 0.5 m in front of the subject. The startle probe was a 50 ms burst of white noise delivered over headphones on average 4 s after picture onset. The muscle activity was stored for off-line analysis (Geier et al., 2000
), and the startle amplitude (peak activity) was used as the outcome measure. The startle response was standardized with a z-transformation with respect to intra-subject baseline level and variability to correct for varying signal quality.
Statistical analysis
In the confirmatory part of the statistical analysis of the results of the present study, the t-statistic for paired observations was used to decide whether the data contain sufficient evidence in favour of the following (alternative) hypotheses: (1) the startle response elicited during the presentation of alcohol-associated cues is reduced, compared with the response during the presentation of affectively negative cues (Grüsser et al., 2002
); (2) the startle response elicited during the presentation of alcohol-associated cues is reduced compared with the response during the presentation of affectively neutral cues (Mucha et al., 2000
; Grüsser et al., 2002
); (3) the startle response during the presentation of alcohol-associated cues is similar to the response to affectively positive stimuli among alcoholics (Grüsser et al., 2002
). In order to keep the multiple type-I error risk <5%, the sequentially rejective procedure of Holm (1979)
was applied. Accordingly, any of the significance statements made in the Results section refers to an experiment- rather than comparison-wise type-I error risk bounded by 5%. Since the first two individual hypotheses are uni- rather than bilateral, both corresponding tests were performed in a one-sided manner. Furthermore, hypothesis 3 states equivalence of alcohol-associated and affectively positive stimuli. Hence, a testing procedure appropriate for the latter is the paired t-test for equivalence as described by Wellek (2002)
. In this approach, equivalence is defined through the standardized difference
/
D of the two means under assessment. The equivalence range for
/
D was specified (-0.5, 0.5), and the P-value computed from the non-central F-distribution with 1, n - 1 degrees of freedom and non-centrality parameter 0.25n.
At the exploratory level, the following additional analyses were performed. The correlation between (1) the startle response to alcohol cues and alcohol consumption in emotionally positive situations and (2) the severity of withdrawal-like symptoms before alcohol intake and emotionally negative drinking situations was measured by means of the ordinary product-moment correlation coefficient. Finally, linear multiple regression techniques were used to assess the association of: (1) the startle response to alcohol cues; (2) alcohol consumption during positive mood states; (3) negative mood states; (4) withdrawal-like symptoms, with the craving factors obsession, control impairment and interference (Roberts et al., 1999
).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The startle response during the presentation of alcohol-associated pictures was found to be significantly decreased as compared to the response during presentation of affectively negative cues (t = -2.26, P = 0.0149; see Fig. 1
|
As hypothesized, appetitive responses towards alcohol-associated cues, as indicated by a low startle response during the presentation of alcohol-associated cues, showed a positive correlation (r = 0.37, descriptive P < 0.05) with drinking situations in positive mood states assessed with the IDS (Victorio-Estrada et al., 1996
In a multiple linear regression analysis, appetitive responses to alcohol-associated cues, alcohol consumption during positive and negative mood states, and withdrawal-like symptoms explained 52% of the variance of the craving factor obsession. The severity of withdrawal-like symptoms that precede alcohol intake (CIWA score) was the only factor that substantially contributed to explaining the variance of obsessive craving (ß' = 0.59, rpart = 0.59, descriptive P < 0.005); post-hoc analysis showed that, in most patients, symptoms such as paroxysmal sweats (r = 0.58, descriptive P = 0.001) and auditory disturbances (r = 0.55, descriptive P = 0.001) contributed to this association, whereas patients hardly ever reported agitation (r = 0.12; descriptive P = 0.5) or anxiety (r = 0.20; descriptive P = 0.3).
Drinking in positive (ß' = 0.21, rpart = 0.18, descriptive P = 0.4) and negative situations (ß' = 0.02, rpart = 0.02, descriptive P = 0.9) and appetitive responses to alcohol-associated cues (ß' = -0.04, rpart = -0.04, descriptive P = 0.8) proved to be of little, if any, relevance for predicting the intensity of obsessive alcohol craving.
Interference with social and work functioning was also explained to a relevant extent by the factors of appetitive responses to alcohol-associated cues, alcohol consumption during positive and negative mood states, and withdrawal-like symptoms (r2 = 44%). Alcohol consumption in positive mood states was the only factor which showed some association with interference (ß' = 0.61, partial rpart = 0.44, descriptive P < 0.05). Neither drinking in negative situations (ß' = -0.07, rpart = -0.07, descriptive P = 0.8) nor appetitive responses to alcohol-associated cues (ß' = 0.15, rpart = 0.17, descriptive P = 0.5) or withdrawal-like symptoms preceding alcohol intake (ß' = 0.02, rpart = 0.02, descriptive P = 0.9) could be used to explain a substantial proportion of the variance of the interference of alcohol intake with social and work functioning. Finally, in a linear model relating control impairment to all four covariables taken into account, only r2 = 29% of the variance of the dependent variable could be explained by the regression function.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We were able to confirm some, but not all, of the hypotheses regarding reward craving and withdrawal relief craving as two different craving types (Verheul et al., 1999
We used the CIWA score (Sullivan et al., 1989
) to assess the severity of withdrawal symptoms that precede alcohol intake. This score was developed for observer rating of acute withdrawal severity and the use of this score as a retrospective instrument for the assessment of withdrawal symptoms is purely exploratory. Moreover, some items of this scale rate symptoms which are also found in anxiety or agitation. Conditioned withdrawal may be accompanied by anxiety and anxiety may be misinterpreted by alcohol-dependent subjects as a sign of withdrawal (Cooney et al., 1997
; Verheul et al., 1999
); therefore, it may be extremely difficult to separate effects of anxiety from conditioned withdrawal. However, in this study, the items in the CIWA score which mainly contributed to the association with obsessive craving were paroxysmal sweats and auditory disturbances and not those such as agitation or anxiety, which may reflect anxiety disorders, rather than conditioned withdrawal. Given the lack of standardized assessment procedures for conditioned withdrawal, the modification of established withdrawal scores may offer a viable way to measure conditioned compensatory responses (Siegel, 1983
) in alcoholism and their association with drinking situations.
The craving factor obsession in the OCDS (Anton et al., 1996
) was associated with anxiety and distressful preoccupation with alcohol-related ideas and impulses (Roberts et al., 1999
). Therefore, we hypothesized that withdrawal relief craving and drinking in negative situations contribute to this craving factor. This was confirmed for withdrawal relief craving, but not drinking in negative situations, confirming the observation that withdrawal relief craving is not exclusively associated with alcohol intake during negative mood states.
The craving factor of control impairment decreases under naltrexone medication (Roberts et al., 1999
), which blocks opioid receptors and inhibits pleasant emotions evoked by alcohol intake (Volpicelli et al., 1995
). Therefore, we hypothesized that appetitive responses to alcohol-associated cues and drinking in positive situations may contribute to this craving factor, and that reward craving elicited by appetitive alcohol cues and positive mood states may also induce interference with social and work functioning. Contrary to our hypotheses, drinking in positive situations and appetitive reactions to alcohol cues contributed to the craving factor interference but not to control impairment. Both craving factors are derived from the OCDS and may not adequately reflect the concept of reward craving (Verheul et al., 1999
). In any case, alcohol consumption in positive situations was associated with problems of role functioning, reflected in the craving factor interference of the OCDS.
In summary, our study supports the notion of different pathways leading to different types of alcohol craving (Niaura et al., 1988
; Verheul et al., 1999
). We observed a correlation between appetitive reactions to alcohol cues and drinking in positive situations, which contributed to the impairment of social and work functioning. Withdrawal-like symptoms that precede alcohol intake contributed to obsessive alcohol craving, a distressful preoccupation with alcohol-related ideas and impulses to consume alcohol. Contrary to our hypotheses, withdrawal-like symptoms correlated not only with drinking in negative, but also positive, situations, indicating that conditioned withdrawal may be primarily associated with hedonic dysregulation, rather than the obsessivecompulsive aspects of alcohol craving per se. We used an exploratory method to assess withdrawal relief craving, namely the self-reported occurrence of withdrawal-like symptoms, which regularly precede alcohol intake. Conditioned alcohol-opposite psychophysiological responses may be better-suited to measure the severity of conditioned withdrawal; however, this approach is limited by the fact that alcohol-like and withdrawallike psychophysiological reactions overlap clinically (Niaura et al., 1988
). The assessment of drinking situations and of appetitive and withdrawal-like reactions to alcohol in association with neuroimaging (Volkow et al., 1996
; Heinz et al., 1998
; Braus et al., 2001
) may be best suited to further explore the neurobiological pathways associated with different craving types and to select the appropriate anti-craving medication.
| ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study was supported by the DFG (He 2597/4-1) and the BMBF (01EB0110).
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Psychiatry of the Charité, Humboldt University, Schumannstr. 20/21, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abi-Dargham, A., Krystal, J. H., Anjivel, S., Scanley, B. E., Zoghbi, S., Baldwin, R. M., Rajeevan, N., Ellis, S., Petrakis, I. L., Seibyl, J. P., Charney, D. S., Laruelle, M. and Innis, R. (1998) Alterations of benzodiazepine receptors in type II alcoholic subjects measured with SPECT and [123]Iomezanil. American Journal of Psychiatry 155, 15501555.
Anton, R. F., Moak, D. H. and Latham, P. K. (1996) The obsessive compulsive drinking scale. Archives of General Psychiatry 53, 225231.[Abstract]
Bradley, M. M., Cuthbert, B. N. and Lang, P. J. (1990) Startle reflex modification: emotion or attention? Psychophysiology 27, 513522.[ISI][Medline]
Braus, D. F., Wrase, J., Grüsser, S. M., Hermann, D., Ruf, M., Flor, H., Mann, K. and Heinz, A. (2001) Alcohol-associated cues activate the ventral striatum in alcoholics. Journal of Neural Transmission 108, 887894.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Carter, B. L. and Tiffany, S. T. (1999) Meta-analysis of cue-reactivity in addiction research. Addiction 94, 327340.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Cook, E. W. III, Davis, T. L., Hawk, L. W., Spence, E. L. and Glautier, C. H. (1992) Fearfulness and startle potentiation during aversive visual stimuli. Psychophysiology 29, 633645.[ISI][Medline]
Cooney, N. L., Litt, M. D., Morse, P. A., Bauer, L. O. and Gaupp, L. (1997) Alcohol cue reactivity, negative-mood reactivity, and relapse in treated alcoholic men. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 106, 243250.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Di Chiara, G. (1995) The role of dopamine in drug abuse viewed from the perspective of its role in motivation. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 38, 95137.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Edwards, G. (1990) Withdrawal symptoms and alcohol dependence: fruitful mysteries. British Journal Addiction 85, 447461.
Fähndrich, E. and Stieglitz, R. D. (1997) Das AMDP System. Manual zur Dokumentation psychiatrischer Befunde, 6th edn. Hogrefe, Göttingen.
Geier, A., Mucha, R. F. and Pauli, P. (2000) Appetitive nature of drug cues confirmed with physiological measures in a model using pictures of smoking. Psychopharmacology 150, 283289.[CrossRef][Medline]
Grüsser, S. M., Heinz, A., Raabe, A., Wessa, M., Podschus, J. and Flor, H. (2002) Stimulus-induced craving and startle potentiation in abstinent alcoholics and controls. European Psychiatry 17, 188193.
Heinz, A., Ragan, P., Jones, W., Hommer, D., Williams, W., Knable, M. B., Gorey, J., Doty, L., Geyer, C., Lee, K. S., Coppola, R., Weinberger, D. R. and Linnoila, M. (1998) Reduced serotonin transporters in alcoholism. American Journal of Psychiatry 155, 15441549.
Holm, S. (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6, 6570.[ISI]
Koob, G. F. (1992) Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 13, 177184.[CrossRef][Medline]
Koob, G. F. and Le Moal, M. (1997) Drug abuse: hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science 278, 5258.
Lang, P. J. (1995) The emotion probe: studies of motivation and attention. American Psychologist 50, 372385.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M. and Cuthberg, B. N. (1990) Emotion, attention, and startle reflex. Psychological Reviews 97, 377395.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Littleton, J. (1995) Acamprosate in alcohol dependence: how does it work? Addiction 90, 11791188.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
McCusker, C. G. and Brown, K. (1990) Alcohol-predictive cues enhance tolerance and precipitate "craving" for alcohol in social drinkers. Journal of Studies on Alcoholism 51, 494499.[ISI][Medline]
Monti, P. M., Rohsenow, D. J., Hutchinson, K. E., Swift, R. M., Mueller, T. I., Colby, S. M., Brown, R. A., Gulliver, S. B., Gordon, A. and Abrams, D. B. (1999) Naltrexones effect on cue-elicited craving among alcoholics in treatment. Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research 23, 13861394.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Mucha, R. F., Geier, A., Stuhlinger, M. and Mundle, G. (2000) Appetitive effects of drug cues modelled by pictures of the intake ritual: generality of cue-modulated startle examined with inpatient alcoholics. Psychopharmacology 151, 428432.[CrossRef][Medline]
Niaura, R. S., Rohsenow, D. J., Binkoff, J. A., Monti, P. M., Pedrazza, M. and Abrams, D. B. (1988) Relevance of cue reactivity to understanding alcohol and smoking relapse. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 97, 133152.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
OBrien, C., Childress, A. R., Ehrman, R. and Robbins, S. J. (1998) Conditioning factors in drug abuse: can they explain compulsion? Journal of Psychopharmacology 12, 1522.
Roberts, J. S., Anton, R. F., Latham, P. K. and Moak, D. H. (1999) Factor structure and predictive validity of the obsessive compulsive drinking scale. Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research 23, 14841491.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Robinson, T. E. and Berridge, K. C. (1993) The neural basis of drug craving: an incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews 18, 247291.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sass, H., Soyka, M., Mann, K. and Zieglgänsberger, W. (1996) Relapse prevention by acamprosate: results from a placebo-controlled study on alcohol dependence. Archives of General Psychiatry 53, 673680.[Abstract]
Siegel, S. (1983) Classical conditioning, drug tolerance and drug dependence. In Research Advances on Alcohol and Drug Problems, Israel, I. and Glaser, F. B. et al., eds, pp. 207246. Plenum Press, New York.
Skinner, H. A. and Sheu, W. J. (1982) Reliability of alcohol use indices. Journal of Studies on Alcoholism 43, 11571170.[ISI][Medline]
Spanagel, R. and Zieglgänsberger, W. (1997) Anti-craving compounds: new pharmacological tools to study addictive processes. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences 18, 5459.[Medline]
Spanagel, R., Herz, A. and Shippenberg, T. S. (1992) Opposing tonically active endogeneous opioid systems modulate the mesolimbic dopaminergic pathway. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 89, 20462050.
Stewart, J., deWit, H. and Eickelboom, R. (1984) The role of unconditioned and conditioned drug effects in the self-administration of opiates and stimulants. Psychological Reviews, 91, 251268.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Sullivan, J. T., Sykora, K., Schneiderman, J., Narkanjo, C.A. and Sellers, E. M. (1989) Assessment of alcohol withdrawal: the revised Clinical Institute Assessment for Alcohol Scale (CIWA-Ar). British Journal of Addiction 84, 13531357.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Tsai, G., Gastfriend, D. R. and Coyle, J. T. (1995) The glutamatergic basis of human alcoholism. American Journal of Psychiatry 152, 332340.
Verheul, R., Van den Brink, W. and Geerlings, P. (1999) A three-pathway psychobiological model of craving for alcohol. Alcohol and Alcoholism 34, 197222.
Victorio-Estrada, A. and Mucha, R. F. (1997) The inventory of drinking situations (IDS) in current drinkers with different degrees of alcohol problems. Addictive Behaviors 22, 557565.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Victorio-Estrada, A., Mucha, R. F. and Stephan, E. R. (1996) Excessive drinking situations in German alcoholics: replication of a three-factor model used for North Americans. Drug and Alcohol Dependency 41, 7579.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. J., Fowler, J. S., Logan, J., Hitzemann, R., Ding, Y. S., Pappas, N., Shea, C. and Piscani, K. (1996) Decreases in dopamine receptors but not in dopamine transporters in alcoholics. Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research 20, 15941598.[ISI][Medline]
Volpicelli, J. R., Watson, N. T., King, A. C., Sherman, C. E. and OBrien, C. P. (1995) Effect of naltrexone on alcohol high in alcoholics. American Journal of Psychiatry 152, 613615.
Vrana, S. R., Spence, E. L. and Lang, P. J. (1988) The startle probe response: a new measure of emotion? Journal of Abnormal Psychology 97, 487491.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
Wellek, S. (2002) Testing Statistical Hypotheses of Equivalence. Chapman and Hall, London/CRC, Boca Raton (in press).
Wikler, A. (1948) Recent progress in research on the neurophysiological basis of morphine addiction. American Journal of Psychiatry 105, 329338.
Wise, R. A. (1988) The neurobiology of craving: implications for the understanding and treatment of addiction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 97, 118132.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
World Health Organization (1992) International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision. World Health Organization, Geneva.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Buri, F. Moggi, A. Giovanoli, and W. Strik Prescription procedures in medication for relapse prevention after inpatient treatment for alcohol use disorders in Switzerland Alcohol Alcohol., July 1, 2007; 42(4): 333 - 339. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Barr, M. Schwandt, S. G. Lindell, S. A. Chen, D. Goldman, S. J. Suomi, J. D. Higley, and M. Heilig Association of a Functional Polymorphism in the {micro}-Opioid Receptor Gene With Alcohol Response and Consumption in Male Rhesus Macaques Arch Gen Psychiatry, March 1, 2007; 64(3): 369 - 376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. N. CARDOSO, A. BARBOSA, F. ISMAIL, and S. POMBO NETER ALCOHOLIC TYPOLOGY (NAT) Alcohol Alcohol., March 1, 2006; 41(2): 133 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. KIEFER and K. WIEDEMANN COMBINED THERAPY: WHAT DOES ACAMPROSATE AND NALTREXONE COMBINATION TELL US? Alcohol Alcohol., November 1, 2004; 39(6): 542 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


