Skip Navigation


Alcohol and Alcoholism Advance Access originally published online on October 5, 2004
Alcohol and Alcoholism 2004 39(6):477; doi:10.1093/alcalc/agh102
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/6/477    most recent
agh102v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SLATTERY, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SLATTERY, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Alcohol & Alcoholism Vol. 39, No. 6 © Medical Council on Alcohol 2004; all rights reserved

INVITED COMMENTARY

PRAGMATIC TRIALS AND THE ARES STUDY

JIM SLATTERY

Head of Health Services Research Unit, NHS Quality Improvement Scotland

Correspondence: Jim.Slattery@emea.eu.int

(Received 10 July 2004)

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

The ARES study (Kiritzé-Topor et al., 2004Go) addresses an important issue of the use of acamprosate in general practice patients with alcohol dependence. The paper gives a strongly argued advocacy for pragmatic trials in alcohol dependence. The authors have tried to ensure that the study closely mimics clinical practice in almost all possible ways, thus increasing the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?