Skip Navigation



Alcohol and Alcoholism Advance Access published online on October 6, 2009

Alcohol and Alcoholism, doi:10.1093/alcalc/agp069
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
45/1/45    most recent
agp069v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Grove, R.
Right arrow Articles by Slade, T.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Grove, R.
Right arrow Articles by Slade, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Medical Council on Alcohol]. All rights reserved

Towards DSM-V: Exploring Diagnostic Thresholds for Alcohol Dependence and Abuse

Rachel Grove1,*, Orla McBride2,3 and Tim Slade1

1 National Drug & Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
2 School of Psychology, University of Ulster Magee Campus, Co. Londonderry, UK
3 Department of Epidemiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA

* Corresponding author: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Tel: +612-9385-0312; Fax: +612-9385-0222; E-mail: r.grove{at}unsw.edu.au

Received 2 July 2009; first review notified 13 August 2009; in revised form 8 September 2009; accepted 11 September 2009


   Abstract

Aims: The expected release of the DSM-V in 2012 has renewed the longstanding debate around whether alcohol use disorders are best conceptualized as dimensional or categorical constructs. The current study aimed to validate the current diagnostic thresholds for alcohol dependence and abuse using epidemiological indicators including mental health, disability, psychological distress, functional impairment, service use, suicidality and early age of drinking onset. Methods: Dichotomous variables were created to allocate a representative sample of Australian adult drinkers (n = 4920) above and below each possible threshold for both disorders. Regression analyses were conducted to assess group differences at each threshold for each epidemiological indicator. Results: There was some albeit limited support for the current diagnostic threshold of three criteria for alcohol dependence and one criterion for abuse. A number of other cut-offs also showed consistent variation for both disorders. Conclusions: It is essential to define diagnostic thresholds in a systematic way. The current diagnostic thresholds for alcohol dependence and abuse are adequate but require further validation using a variety of methods and external indicators. Combining these disorders in some way may also prove useful as well as including other potential diagnostic criteria in future research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.