Skip Navigation


Alcohol and Alcoholism Advance Access originally published online on August 30, 2005
Alcohol and Alcoholism 2005 40(6):535-539; doi:10.1093/alcalc/agh199
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/6/535    most recent
agh199v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRAY, E.
Right arrow Articles by STRANG, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GRAY, E.
Right arrow Articles by STRANG, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Medical Council on Alcohol. All rights reserved

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING DELIVERED BY YOUTH WORKERS IN REDUCING DRINKING, CIGARETTE AND CANNABIS SMOKING AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE: QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL PILOT STUDY

EMILY GRAY, JIM McCAMBRIDGE* and JOHN STRANG

National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry (King's College London), 4 Windsor Walk, Camberwell, London SE5 8AF, UK

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at: Fax: +44 (0)207 7018454; E-mail: J.McCambridge{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk

(First received 10 May 2005; first review notified 8 July 2005; in final revised form 27 July 2005; accepted 28 July 2005)

Aim: To test whether a single session of Motivational Interviewing (MI) focussing on drinking alcohol, and cigarette and cannabis smoking, would successfully lead to reductions in use or problems. Methods: Naturalistic quasi-experimental study, in 162 young people (mean age 17 years) who were daily cigarette smokers, weekly drinkers or weekly cannabis smokers, comparing 59 receiving MI with 103 non-intervention assessment-only controls. MI was delivered in a single session by youth workers or by the first author. Assessment was made of changes in self-reported cigarette, alcohol, cannabis use and related indicators of risk and problems between recruitment and after 3 months by self-completion questionnaire. Results: 87% of subjects (141 of 162) were followed up. The most substantial evidence of benefit was achieved in relation to alcohol consumption, with those receiving MI drinking on average two days per month less than controls after 3 months. Weaker evidences of impact on cigarette smoking, and no evidence of impact on cannabis use, were obtained. Conclusions: Evidence of effectiveness for the delivery of MI by youth workers in routine conditions has been identified. However, the extent of benefit is much more modest than previously identified in efficacy studies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.