Skip Navigation


Alcohol and Alcoholism Advance Access originally published online on August 8, 2005
Alcohol and Alcoholism 2005 40(6):524-530; doi:10.1093/alcalc/agh193
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/6/524    most recent
agh193v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VITALE, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by VAN DE WIEL, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VITALE, S. G.
Right arrow Articles by VAN DE WIEL, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Medical Council on Alcohol. All rights reserved

SELF-REPORTED ALCOHOL USE AMONG DUTCH EMERGENCY ROOM PATIENTS: VARIATIONS IN PREVALENCE RATES OWING TO METHODOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES

SALVATORE G. VITALE1,*, DIKE VAN DE MHEEN1, HENK F. L. GARRETSEN1,3 and ALBERT VAN DE WIEL2

1 Addiction Research Institute (IVO), Heemraadssingel 194, 3021 DM Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands and 3 Tilburg University, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Tilburg, The Netherlands

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at: Tel.: +31 10 4253366; Fax: +31 10 2763988; E-mail: vitale{at}ivo.nl

(Received 23 March 2005; first review notified 13 May 2005; in revised form 28 June 2005; accepted 5 July 2005)

Aims: This study compared different methods of assessing self-reported alcohol use among emergency room patients in order to explain the variations in reported prevalence rates. Methods: Alcohol use prior to patient's injury or illness was assessed in one hospital by a self-report questionnaire in three different ways: (i) administered by emergency room staff, (ii) administered by research staff, or (iii) sent to the patient's home by post. Results: Results show variations in self-reported alcohol use 6 h prior to the injury or illness ranging from 4.6 to 9.1%; these variations may be explained by sample selection bias and characteristics of the included study populations. When self-report is combined with staff judgement the corresponding prevalence rates are 6.8% for research staff and 16.2% for emergency room staff. This shows that the latter judge the patient's alcohol use more efficiently than the research staff. Using research staff 24 h a day resulted in almost no sample bias. Data collection via emergency room staff leads to the highest alcohol use prevalence rates and to the highest sample bias; this was influenced by the emergency room characteristics. A retrospective mail survey results in an older sample with age-related (lower) alcohol use and emergency room characteristics related to this age group. Conclusions: Future studies using patient self-report among emergency room samples should consider carefully the influence of sample selection bias. The combination of the research staff handing out the questionnaire and the emergency room staff giving their judgement on the patient's alcohol use seems to be a useful method.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Alcohol AlcoholHome page
S. G. VITALE, D. VAN DE MHEEN, A. VAN DE WIEL, and H. F.L. GARRETSEN
ALCOHOL AND ILLICIT DRUG USE AMONG EMERGENCY ROOM PATIENTS IN THE NETHERLANDS
Alcohol Alcohol., September 1, 2006; 41(5): 553 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.