Skip Navigation


Alcohol and Alcoholism Advance Access originally published online on August 2, 2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
39/5/439    most recent
agh077v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Den Bruel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Buntinx, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Den Bruel, A.
Right arrow Articles by Buntinx, F.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Alcohol & Alcoholism Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 439-444, 2004
Alcohol & Alcoholism Vol. 39, No. 5 © Medical Council on Alcohol 2004; all rights reserved

CUGE: A SCREENING INSTRUMENT FOR ALCOHOL ABUSE AND DEPENDENCE IN STUDENTS

A. Van Den Bruel1,*, B. Aertgeerts1, K. Hoppenbrouwers2, M. Roelants2 and F. Buntinx1

1 Department of General Practice and 2 Department of Adolescent Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at: Academisch Centrum Huisartsgeneeskunde, Kapucijnenvoer 33 blok J, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. Tel.: 0032 16 33 74 93; Fax: 0032 16 33 74 80; E-mail: ann.vandenbruel{at}med.kuleuven.ac.be

(Received 3 February 2004; first review notified 24 March 2004; in revised form 13 May 2004; accepted 13 May 2004)

Objectives: The prevalence of alcohol abuse on college campuses ranges from 7 to 17%. Frequent heavy drinkers place themselves and others at risk for a variety of adverse consequences and frequently remain undetected. Brief individual interventions result in a significant reduction on the number of drinks. Therefore, detection of students at risk is useful and desirable. The CUGE has been elsewhere described as a promising screening device for problem drinking in students. In order to determine the diagnostic value of this new questionnaire, we set up a validation study in a new and independent population of freshmen.

Methods: A cross-sectional diagnostic study. Participants were college freshmen of the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. All students received a questionnaire, containing the CUGE, being the test of interest, and the CIDI as the reference test.

Results: The CUGE combines a very high sensitivity of 91% with a reasonable specificity of 76.3% in this validation group.

Conclusions: The CUGE is an excellent screening device in this population of students. In addition, it is a short questionnaire with only yes or no questions. This makes the CUGE easily applicable as a part of broad routine questionnaires.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.