Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Maurer, K. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Maurer, K. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Alcohol & Alcoholism Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 130-134, 2004
Alcohol & Alcoholism Vol. 39, No. 2 © Medical Council on Alcohol 2004; all rights reserved.

UNITED KINGDOM AND UNITED STATES HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS' RECOMMENDATIONS OF ABSTINENCE VERSUS CONTROLLED DRINKING

W. Miles Cox1,*, Harold Rosenberg2, C. Hazel A. Hodgins1, John I. Macartney1 and Ken A. Maurer2

1 University of Wales, Bangor, UK and 2 Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Kentucky, USA

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at: School of Psychology, Brigantia Building, University of Wales, Bangor LL57 2AS, UK. E-mail: m.cox{at}bangor.ac.uk.

(Received 25 July 2003; first review notified 11 October 2003; in revised form 15 December 2003; accepted 16 December 2003)

Aim: To assess whether selected characteristics of problem drinkers influence treatment goal recommendations — abstinence or controlled drinking — by healthcare providers in the UK and the US. Methods: Sixteen case-histories, composed with varying information regarding the clients' level of problem severity, degree of social support and sex, were read by 41 UK and 31 US healthcare providers, who then gave a recommendation of controlled drinking versus abstinence for each case on a seven-point Likert scale. Results: Overall, abstinence was recommended more strongly for higher-severity problem drinkers, those with higher social support (an unpredicted finding), and for female clients. Controlled drinking was more often recommended in the UK than in the US. However, the degree to which drinkers' problem severity, social support and sex each affected respondents' ratings depended on the level of one or more of the other variables and the country of the respondents. Conclusion: The degree to which healthcare providers recommend abstinence or controlled drinking as an outcome goal for problem drinkers varies according to both client characteristics and the country in which they work.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Alcohol AlcoholHome page
N. Heather, S. J. Adamson, D. Raistrick, G. P. Slegg, and on behalf of the UKATT Research Team
Initial Preference for Drinking Goal in the Treatment of Alcohol Problems: I. Baseline Differences Between Abstinence and Non-Abstinence Groups
Alcohol Alcohol., March 1, 2010; 45(2): 128 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Body SocietyHome page
D. Gimlin
Accounting for Cosmetic Surgery in the USA and Great Britain: A Cross-cultural Analysis of Women's Narratives
Body Society, March 1, 2007; 13(1): 41 - 60.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.