Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brooks, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Alcohol and Alcoholism Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 419-420, 2002
© 2002 Medical Council on Alcohol

INVITED COMMENTARY

THE SWEDISH STATE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY BOARD (SBU) REPORT ON TREATMENT OF ALCOHOL AND DRUG MISUSE: AN ECONOMIST’S VIEW

Richard Brooks

Department of Economics, Strathclyde University, Curran Building, 100 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G4 0LN, UK

Received 14 May 2002; first review notified 15 May 2002; )

ABSTRACT

— The Swedish State Health Technology Board (SBU) has published a Report on the treatment of alcohol and drug misuse (SBU, 2001). This article is a brief Commentary on the economic issues raised in Chapter 9 of the Report, in particular, the question of ‘how cost-effective are the different treatment alternatives?’ An outline is given of how the authors approached the economic work, with particular reference to a standard checklist approach to judging the quality of published economic appraisals. A paucity of such appraisals was retrieved and detailed review of just 16 papers was undertaken. The authors are critical of the lack of quality of economic work in the substance misuse area and their main points are summarized here. The main conclusion drawn is that no economic judgements can be made about alternative treatment approaches, and more study and research are needed in this area. Chapter 9 is, on balance, a good attempt at a critical review of the economic appraisal literature. Unfortunately the main Report provides a series of summary judgements on the effectiveness or otherwise of alternative treatments, which, while recognizing the need for further cost-effectiveness work, essentially ignores the conclusion drawn in the economics chapter. This is likely to do a disservice to the cause of appropriate resource allocation in the substance misuse area.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Alcohol AlcoholHome page
C. Barbosa, C. Godfrey, and S. Parrott
Methodological Assessment of Economic Evaluations of Alcohol Treatment: What Is Missing?
Alcohol Alcohol., October 6, 2009; (2009) agp067v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Alcohol AlcoholHome page
J. M. LITTLETON, P. DE WITTE, R. LITTEN, G. L. GESSA, R. SPANAGEL, H. KRANZLER, P. LEHERT, B. JOHNSON, J. SAUNDERS, M. BERGLUND, et al.
CHALLENGES TO MEDICATIONS DEVELOPMENT IN TREATING ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE: SUMMARY OF A SYMPOSIUM HELD AT THE ESBRA CONGRESS, PRAGUE, 13 SEPTEMBER 2003
Alcohol Alcohol., July 1, 2004; 39(4): 271 - 275.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.