Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Timney, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pearson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Timney, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Alcohol and Alcoholism Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 741-749, 1999
© 1999 Medical Council on Alcoholism

FREQUENCY SELECTIVE EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL ON AUDITORY DETECTION AND FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION THRESHOLDS

P. Pearson1, L. A. Dawe2 and B. Timney*

Department of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5C2

Received 9 September 1998; first review notified 13 January 1999; accepted 10 March 1999

In the first of two experiments, the effects of ethyl alcohol on monaural and binaural thresholds for pure tones were measured for a range of frequencies. The results showed a frequency-specific effect in which low frequencies were more severely affected than higher ones. Also, monaural thresholds tended to be more affected by alcohol than binaural ones. The second experiment extended this exploration by measuring frequency discrimination at several different frequencies. In this case, we also obtained a frequency-dependent effect: the increase in discrimination thresholds above 1000 Hz was three times greater than that for lower frequencies. The data suggest that the choice of stimuli may influence the ability to detect changes in auditory performance after alcohol and may account in part for the differences among earlier studies. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that alcohol is acting centrally, at the level of mechanisms involved in the temporal and binaural summation of auditory signals, rather than influencing peripheral structures.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.