Alcohol and Alcoholism Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 590-600, 1999
© 1999 Medical Council on Alcoholism
REGRET IS WHAT YOU GET: THE EFFECTS OF MANIPULATING ANTICIPATED AFFECT AND TIME PERSPECTIVE ON RISKY SINGLE-OCCASION DRINKING
Department of Psychology, University of East London, Romford Road, London E15 4LZ,
1 School of Social Sciences, Staffordshire University, College Road, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE and
2 School of Social and Policy Sciences, University of Westminster, 309 Regent Street, London W1R 8AL, UK
Received 10 July 1998; first review notified 18 November 1998; accepted 20 December 1998
This study tested anticipated affect as a potential strategy for reducing risky single-occasion drinking (RSOD). The hypothesis was that asking respondents to focus on their anticipated affect following RSOD would lead to higher ratings of negative affect than those obtained when asking respondents to focus on their feelings towards RSOD. In turn, these negative affect ratings were hypothesized as leading to safer behavioural estimates and reductions in RSOD. The study is based on a self-report questionnaire administered at two time points. At Time 1, measures of past drinking and demographic information were collected, along with affect ratings of drinking within safer single-occasion limits and affect ratings of RSOD (within-subjects condition). Time perspective was manipulated whereby the experimental group was asked to focus on affective reactions after RSOD and the control group to focus on affective reactions towards RSOD (between-subjects condition). Two weeks later, drinking behaviour was measured. The findings showed that the time perspective manipulation resulted in significantly higher negative affect ratings in the feeling after condition than in the feeling towards condition. Further, females reported lower negative affect than males. No other main or interaction effects were found. The time perspective manipulation, however, failed to produce safer behavioural estimates and RSOD reduction at follow-up. No significant differences were found between ratings of negative affect when drinking within safe limits as compared with ratings of affect when drinking above such limits. Despite greater negative affect ‘after’ rather than ‘toward’ the target behaviour, anticipated affect following RSOD did not yield safer behavioural estimates and subsequent drinking reduction at follow-up. These findings are interpreted in the context of risk perception associated with RSOD. The implications of this study for design of interventions aimed at reducing RSOD are discussed. In particular, ways of intensifying negative affect for RSOD are considered.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. C. Sorum, E. Mullet, J. Shim, S. Bonnin-Scaon, G. Chasseigne, and J. Cogneau Avoidance of Anticipated Regret: The Ordering of Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests Med Decis Making, March 1, 2004; 24(2): 149 - 159. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|