Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VANCLAY, F.
Right arrow Articles by SINGH, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VANCLAY, F.
Right arrow Articles by SINGH, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 Medical Council on Alcohol


research-article

A COMMUNITY SCREENING TEST FOR HIGH ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION USING BIOCHEMICAL AND HAEMATOLOGICAL MEASURES

FRANK VANCLAY, BEVERLEY RAPHAEL*, MICHAEL DUNNE, JOHN WHITFIELD{dagger}, TERRY LEWIN{ddagger} and BRUCE SINGH§

Department of Psychiatry, University of Queensland Brisbane
{dagger}Clinical Biochemistry Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Sydney
{ddagger}Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Newcastle Newcastle
§Department of Psychological Medicine, Monash University Melbourne, Australia

*Author for correspondence at: Department of Psychiatry, University of Queensland, Clinical Sciences Building, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland 4029, Australia

Received 12 March 1990; accepted 12 March 1991

A discriminant function based on a number of biochemical and haematological tests from an extended multiple biochemical analysis and full blood count, together with weight, smoking status and systolic blood pressure is developed. The function was far more effective at detecting high alcohol use (< 40 g ethanol per day) than serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) or the Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test (SMAST) in a community sample of adult males. When classifying high alcohol consumption by GGT only, several division criteria were considered, the most effective being at 40 i.u./l. In terms of identifying high alcohol consumers, rather than alcoholics, the SMAST was no better than GGT, and both had unacceptably low sensitivity (49%, 51%) and poor performance on other measures, thus limiting their use as community screening tools. The discriminant function, however, had an estimated community sensitivity of 78%, was similarly high on other performance measures, and would perform satisfactorily as a community screening tool, particularly in situations where there was a tendency for individuals to under-report their alcohol consumption.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.