Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RUTTER, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by HAGART, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RUTTER, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by HAGART, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1990 Medical Council on Alcohol


research-article

ALCOHOL TRAINING IN SOUTH-EAST ENGLAND: A SURVEY AND EVALUATION

D. R. RUTTER and J. HAGART*

Institute of Social and Applied Psychology, University of Kent at Canterbury Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7LZ, U.K.

*Current address: Department of Administrative and Social Studies, Teesside Polytechnic, Borough Rd, Middlesbrough, Cleveland, TS1 3BA

Received 1 February 1989; accepted 24 July 1990

In 1982, the University of Kent at Canterbury introduced a multi-disciplinary diploma course in alcohol counselling and consultation. The purpose of the report which follows is to assess the existing range and level of alcohol services and training in south-east England against which the course was set up, and to appraise the course itself against its aims and objectives. The first part of the study was based on a questionnaire survey of senior administrators in Health and Social Services in London and the South East, and the examination of the course was based on student progress. The results from the first part of the study are bleak. Respondents believed that the majority of clients with alcohol problems were simply not detected, and a lack of resources to mount satisfactory training schemes was among the principal reasons. Only a minority of the organizations provided secondary-level training of any sort, and the majority placed alcohol problems at the bottom of their priorities for training and, by implication, for services overall. The results from the second part of the study were more encouraging. While there was little to suggest that students' knowledge and attitudes changed during the course, there were a number of small changes in behaviour. The most hopeful findings, however, came from students' and managers' perceptions, where one of the most positive outcomes of the course was a perceived growth in student maturity, confidence, and role security.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.